Yeah im in a similar boat with Clive Walford at TE, i feel like its a tricky position to have a consistent point scorer.
2016 Redcafe NFL Fantasy League
- Thread starter Eboue
- Start date
Was sitting there the entire time watching the game loving Williams making some great plays but saying to myself "just calm the feck down now, you're gonna cost me a win!".
Ended up so close, just 3 points in it after an awesome performance from DeAngelo. Won the game though and the Steelers looked good and won, win/win
Ended up so close, just 3 points in it after an awesome performance from DeAngelo. Won the game though and the Steelers looked good and won, win/win
Yeah, there's just nothing left to turn to now so will stick it out and see how I fair.
My bench is crap that I don't have anyone worth to trade.
I've been reading the stories about Watkins, and was fully assured that he'd probably miss a good few games.
So much so that I dropped him and picked up Cruz. I'm an idiot.
So much so that I dropped him and picked up Cruz. I'm an idiot.
That you are my friend. You basically dropped your third pick.
Also before LM approves trades, could we two days to veto a trade? @Eboue
Yeah thanks for that, ive picked him up in the hope that he gets fit. He might not though.
He is playing on Thursday.
Yeah i know, i will probably stash him on the bench for this week and hope for the best.
Not unless it is something controversial.
Why would we need to veto a trade? If players are colluding?
Collusion!
Name and shame! Who can't we trust?
We shouldn't be able to veto. People will just use it to stop trades they don't like, or traderape, even if they are not a case of collusion. I trust the LM to spot and stop collusion and that should be it.
What? No. Every trade needs to be looked at it by the entire league. Its not like one person vetoing it and the trade falls through. I think the max is 7/12 have to veto for a trade to not go through.
Trades need to be looked at by the people who agree to them. Only when something is egregiously unfair or possibly collusion would anyone else come into it.
Very close between @Eboue and @RedIceland ..
Edit: maybe not, Eboue has loads of people to play still
Edit: maybe not, Eboue has loads of people to play still
He has a co-owner as well, not that the team name would suggest it!
You can change it!
Hmm
Ah ok! I assume you are the brains of the operation then?
Erm, yea sure why not!
at @Man of Leisure bench!
Still looking for a sensible trade for Latavius Murray, continues to score good enough points as always. Only want to trade due to 3 OAK players. Would maybe consider a Carr trade instead but would prefer something for Murray.
What do you need?
A straight RB swap for Murray mate.
Christine Michael is a breakout candidate if ur interested?
Too much of a risk. Murray is a sure fire starter who will be helped out by backup this year to keep him fresh while Michael will be battling with Rawls for the starting spot (didn't catch the Seahawks game so not sure how serious the Rawls leg injury was).
I need a sure fire starter without question marks over their head.
Im open to proposals- but Murray looks to be part of a committee so a sure fire starter may be tough to find.
FFS, should have started Travis Benjamin yesterday. Was even at the game to see both his TDs live.
A draw with @RDCR07 .. What happens now?
It's a tie.
That helps nobody!
Its a miracle I tied. You had two top WRs playing tonight and I had a RB.
It might when it comes down to getting into the playoffs at the end of the year.
Mathews dropped a sure TD aparently..
@Crackers what are you doing