UnofficialDevil
Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
fecking Madrid have 4 players in that list, and they aren't even petrol owned
Saying they cost nothing is quite hyperbolic. The other club didn't receive a transfer fee but Mbappé cost a shitload not counting his massive wages.5 through 9 cost their clubs nothing, and Valverde was about €5m. I don't have a point - I just find that interesting.
I think you need to reread what he wrote.Saying they cost nothing is quite hyperbolic. The other club didn't receive a transfer fee but Mbappé cost a shitload not counting his massive wages.
Yeah. The word is homegrown.I think you need to reread what he wrote.
Also he said 5-9 and mbappe is 4.Yeah. The word is homegrown.
And not Vinicius Jr…? Okay.If you are given a guarantee that you can tie these players down to your club for the entirety of their primes, then I'd say Haaland, Bellingham, Yamal, Mbappé, Saka, and maybe Musiala are worth it.
The others, not so much IMO.
He would be my fav player on the list.Surprised Wirtz is on the list
Cause this has nothing to do with how much a player costs a team on the pitch.Why is Anthony missing from this list?
Good player but hasn’t done anything (yet) to warrant the company he’s keepingHe would be my fav player on the list.
Aside from win the bundesliga.Good player but hasn’t done anything (yet) to warrant the company he’s keeping
All made up, they had Rashford around 140mIs there any science to those values? Or is it just John Transfermarkt marking them all up?
Yep not much as I sayAside from win the bundesliga.
Well considering who he played for, certainly a lot more than saka for example, or yamal.Yep not much as I say
Yamal just helped Spain with the Euros and Saka has been performing in the PL, Europe and at international level for longer.Well considering who he played for, certainly a lot more than saka for example, or yamal.
that explains a lot then...Cause this has nothing to do with how much a player costs a team on the pitch.
I would say winning the Bundesliga with Leverkusen is more impressive.Yamal just helped Spain with the Euros and Saka has been performing in the PL, Europe and at international level for longer.
Just my view but he’s not quite justifying the value yet.
some pretty solid science actually. It's bases on how much teenagers are inclined to pay for them on Fifa with Xbox-gold, of course corrected for exchange rate and inflation...Is there any science to those values? Or is it just John Transfermarkt marking them all up?
Who said anything about Mbappe?Saying they cost nothing is quite hyperbolic. The other club didn't receive a transfer fee but Mbappé cost a shitload not counting his massive wages.
And not Vinicius Jr…? Okay.
He’ll be Real‘s fifth player on the list, I’m afraid.Surprised Wirtz is on the list
Done deal? How will they fit all these players in!He’ll be Real‘s fifth player on the list, I’m afraid.
No. Just a feeling I have.Done deal? How will they fit all these players in!
That's not true, the highest Rashford has been rated at was 85m. And a lot goes into the value estimates, it's definitely not just "made up". They take into account things like the player's potential, their form, their consistency over a long period, their current contract length and their trophy haul including individual awards.All made up, they had Rashford around 140m
I am sure I have seen him at least at 130mThat's not true, the highest Rashford has been rated at was 85m. And a lot goes into the value estimates, it's definitely not just "made up". They take into account things like the player's potential, their form, their consistency over a long period, their current contract length and their trophy haul including individual awards.
That's not true, the highest Rashford has been rated at was 85m. And a lot goes into the value estimates, it's definitely not just "made up". They take into account things like the player's potential, their form, their consistency over a long period, their current contract length and their trophy haul including individual awards.
That is simply not true. Rashford‘s highest value ever was €85m. How much would another club have had to offer United to sell him during his best form? Now you're probably developing a sense of his "value"...All made up, they had Rashford around 140m
Well, you remember incorrectly: https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/marcus-rashford/profil/spieler/258923I am sure I have seen him at least at 130m
That's not really how market value works though.That is simply not true. Rashford‘s highest value ever was €85m. How much would another club have had to offer United to sell him during his best form? Now you're probably developing a sense of his "value"...