Summit
"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2011
- Messages
- 51,051
yupWere you this bad?
yupWere you this bad?
Madrid has always been a pain in the butt for our club ironically, most United fans have a soft spot for RM ( mostly because of Ronaldo playing there).
Think that's Dick Advocaat mate
Further down, the quote from "European football journalist Mina Rzouki on BBC Radio 5 live" is even better:Anybody read that Pat Nevin thing on BBC Sport?
Harping on about Morata always being Chelsea's number 1 target for striker?
Ridiculous
Yeah I didn't talk about this situation in particular. What I meant was in future dealings. Clearly Perez hates us, so much so that he is willing to sell to another club for a lesser price. We should do the same IF it happens in the future. Maybe DDG or whoevr Madrid bid. Of course right now you guys are much better than us, Im talking about in the near future, where, I think United will be a top club again. I have a lot of faith in Jose and the team and think we'll be there among the elite sooner than later. Just stop dealing with Madrid, clearly there is no good relationship there. But if Madrid come asking for a player, flat out reject the offer unless they offer crazy money. I'd rather sell DDG to Barca if he desperately wants to leave.The example would be fine if we had bid for any of your players (this summer), but it was the other way around.
In this case we would be PSG and you Barça.
You do not like Perisic's price but you keep trading. You did not like the price of Morata and United left the talks.
I suppose there was a planning and Lukaku was the first choice, so I do not see why Madrid is guilty here.
About unsettle our players, it's fair between elite teams, but I do not think any of our starters would leave for more money.
Marca have a front page saying that price is 80m Euros plus 5m variables. Same price quoted by Di Marzio.
When did we ever have players of the quality of Zidane, Original Ronaldo, Kaka, Raul, Figo, Cannavaro, Michael Laudrup to name just a few!
We've had some top players but even current Madrid players like Modric, Bale, Benzema, Kroos are better than a lot of what we've had during the PL era.
We didn't buy from Madrid(certainly not their prime players) because Madrid is viewed as the pinnacle of European football.
It's just silly and biased to suggest we've always had equal or better quality players.
English press has a much lower fee then the rest of the world. I doubt the bought him for so much less. Why would they? Chelsea are desperate as were United
That's why I dont pay any attention to them and dont believe their numbersEnglish press is pretty biased when it comes to reporting United purchases and other club purchases.
Zidane moved to Madrid in 2001 from Juventus on a world record fee, by that time United already has legends like Eric cantona and Roy keane at the club and the class of 92 with generational talents like Paul scholes and Ryan giggs follwed by Beckham who were world beaters, with Cole and Yorke in front , then came rvn and Rooney and Cristiano Ronaldo with talents like Ferdinand and vidic and evra who were considered amongst the world's best with Gary neville too who was great. Carrick was also a top talent who is very underrated and was similar level to modric who has shined now with a proper midfeild balance in Madrid which zidane kicked some sense into them because of the makalele saga which had massive effect on their mid back then.
We always had better or equal quality of players in the squad and never have to show an interest in buying Madrid players while Madrid has always looked to upgrade their team with manutd castouts or rejects or legends who had lived their United career with the exception of Ronaldo who achived everything at the club there is to achieve and wanted to move back to his culture near his family and fergie being a man of his word allowed it to happen on great terms.
Madrid again started spend world record money since Perez second stint while fergie was against spending such an obscene amount on lower quality than his squad had with legends so Madrid did sign younger quality back in the start of current decade but at that time they were not better than someone like Carrick who only now have regressed levels with age. Neither was benzema any better than Rooney at that time. Bale is also massively over hyped because of his constant under achivement like the whole real Madrid squad who were second best to Barcelona for a good decade and a half when they just won 1 league title in 8 years with that squad including ronaldo and are now actually living up to their actual potential with zidane who kicked some sense into Madrid about fixing the balance rathaer than pursuing galactico policy.
Kroos was utd bound himself before lvg vetoed that idea and wanted schweinsteiger who suited his Philosophy more but lvg was overconfident in his actual abities and the level of epl game.
But now with Jose era when United flex it's financial muscle for top talents United will get them with ease and would not hesitate to break the record unlike during fergie era.
Madrid have been a big overblown overrated media propoganda machine in few parts of Europe near Spain and few parts of South America with their political circles and govt support, spare same Spanish culture but once we come out of Spanish caccoon and Spanish cultural boundaries, outside information of which europenas are historically ignorant of ,man united is pretty much considered a biggest brand and the club on the planet as a whole, few years of underinvestment by fergie does not change the fact. United now again have top talents in pogba and herrera in the middle who are as good as anyone.
Dare to zouma?
Madrid has always been a pain in the butt for our club ironically, most United fans have a soft spot for RM ( mostly because of Ronaldo playing there).
I'm honestly not too fussed about any other supporters. You said that a move to Chelsea is "better than a move here tbh". I take umbrage with that because it just doesn't sound like a United fan to me. It's a very doom and gloom negative outlook. Even speaking impartially, United would be the better move to me. Bigger stadium, bigger club, greater history and heritage. I don't see Chelsea as a better move. I certainly don't think like that as a United fan. This is Manchester United, the greatest club in the World. Chelsea is not a better move.Oh I get you now. I should wear the rose-tinteds and never have an impartial opinion.
You're why it can be hard to be a United fan around other supporters.
Marca have a front page saying that price is 80m Euros plus 5m variables. Same price quoted by Di Marzio.
How is it that after weeks of wrangling we were no farther forward with Morata but Chelsea got the deal done in a matter of days. Was Woody doing he usual 2nd-class post thing and quibbling over £4.50p train fare?
Madrid have been a big overblown overrated media propoganda machine in few parts of Europe near Spain and few parts of South America with their political circles and govt support, spare same Spanish culture but once we come out of Spanish caccoon and Spanish cultural boundaries, outside information of which europenas are historically ignorant of man united is pretty much considered a biggest brand and the club on the planet as a whole, few years of underinvestment by fergie does not change the fact.
TBF United were very slow getting on social media which doesn't help. I think the fact Ronaldo plays for you also boosts the figures massively, doesn't he have over 100m instagram followers alone?There was a time when you really couldn't measure these things, so it was easy for people to present their opinion as a fact. That time is gone and now we have social media as some sort of indicator and it tells a different story.
Facebook:
United - 73,8 million
Madrid - 104 million
Twitter:
United - 12,1 million
Madrid - 24,4 million
Instagram:
United - 18,4 million
Madrid - 51,1 million
When United started building their brand abroad they were killing it on the pitch and had star players. Your star has faded in the last few years so your point simply doesn't stand. In year 2017 Man United is the one playing catch up.
TBF United were very slow getting on social media which doesn't help. I think the fact Ronaldo plays for you also boosts the figures massively, doesn't he have over 100m instagram followers alone?
If anything that just shows the younger generation perhaps follow Madrid and their star players more
Yeah, we still don't even have a Youtube channel Well, it shouldn't be a surprise I guess seeing the state of our website...TBF United were very slow getting on social media which doesn't help. I think the fact Ronaldo plays for you also boosts the figures massively, doesn't he have over 100m instagram followers alone?
If anything that just shows the younger generation perhaps follow Madrid and their star players more
Yeah, considering how much money we've been creating from sponsors etc, you would think Woodward would find huge motivation from social media. Amazing we haven't tried harder.Yeah, we still don't even have a Youtube channel Well, it shouldn't be a surprise I guess seeing the state of our website...
Yeah, we still don't even have a Youtube channel Well, it shouldn't be a surprise I guess seeing the state of our website...
Does it matter when we joined? If people are interested in United they would follow us whenever we joined. There again United do seem slow to latch onto a lot of things. Their TV channel is dated and their website could do with a makeover.Again it is a lopsided view as we joined in on the social media bandwagon much later. I think we joined Twitter 4 years later than Real?
Does it matter when we joined? If people are interested in United they would follow us whenever we joined. There again United do seem slow to latch onto a lot of things. Their TV channel is dated and their website could do with a makeover.
Matt Law is an Aston Villa supporter.Fee Reported by Di marzio is 80-85m euros. I would like to believe this from someone neutral rather than a chelsea fan in Matt Law