Doracle
Thirsty for Trent
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2017
- Messages
- 4,435
Everton are way above his level.
It would be hilarious to see Moyes’ reaction to him though.
Everton are way above his level.
Invective aside, I really do wonder has happened to Jadon Sancho. There is nothing left to his game. I'm not sure he would even start for most USL clubs.
Saw a post on X which made me chuckle. Utd and Chelsea should play an extra game at the end of the season. Loser gets Sancho. Now that’s something I would pay to watch. SJR could make it PPV to boost the coffers.
I was a video game addict. Its just as hard to stop as taking drugs and you play all day and night with no ability to care for your careerIf Chelsea send him back (so unlikely) he could be used as a swap deal for a German club or a lower level club.
Sad thing is if he’s really addicted to video (video game addiction is real, and honestly if you know someone struggling they have support groups and programs for addicts that are free- at least the support group is)- then i really hope he kicks it. He probably can’t wait to go home and play, thinks about it all day and when he goes home he stays up till 1 or 2
Exactly. If he really is one it’s no joke, and honestly he could turn his life around and his careerI was a video game addict. Its just as hard to stop as taking drugs and you play all day and night with no ability to care for your career
If Chelsea send him back (so unlikely) he could be used as a swap deal for a German club or a lower level club.
Sad thing is if he’s really addicted to video (video game addiction is real, and honestly if you know someone struggling they have support groups and programs for addicts that are free- at least the support group is)- then i really hope he kicks it. He probably can’t wait to go home and play, thinks about it all day and when he goes home he stays up till 1 or 2
born to play for West Ham on 3 times the salary of their best player. Probably alongside LingardEverton are way above his level.
Everton really aren't above his level, some of you are being ridiculous. He's excelled for Dortmund in his first spell and probably would be back there right now if they could afford/justify his wages.
He has issues yes but key amongst them is that he may like Anthony simply be in the wrong league due to lack of explosiveness and I would put money on La ligue suiting him better (which would make for a good load option next season if he's coming back).
He wasn't really that good on his loan spell at Dortmund and that is why they didn't sign himEverton really aren't above his level, some of you are being ridiculous. He's excelled for Dortmund in his first spell and probably would be back there right now if they could afford/justify his wages.
He has issues yes but key amongst them is that he may like Anthony simply be in the wrong league due to lack of explosiveness and I would put money on La ligue suiting him better (which would make for a good load option next season if he's coming back).
He wasn't really that good on his loan spell at Dortmund and that is why they didn't sign him
For the right fee and wages they would have done (hence why he they paid 4m for the loan and he was mostly a starter for them during his time there). My point is if he is capable of playing for them consistently at some level then he can't be seen as below Everton level.
And as I've argued wages are the problem not the transfer fee but we'll have to agree to disagree.I disagree. The reason they paid a loan fee was mainly because they thought they will be getting at least half the player they sold for 72m.
During the loan spell they realised how bad he had become and decided that regardless of the fee / wage they wont sign him.
Why do I think that? They had him on loan and he desperately wanted to leave, so could have worked out a wage. They didn't even both entering fee discussions with Manutd... he went for 20-25m, a fee that is not alien to Dortmund. They regularly pay 25-40m on players.
For the right fee and wages they would have done (hence why he they paid 4m for the loan and he was mostly a starter for them during his time there). My point is if he is capable of playing for them consistently at some level then he can't be seen as below Everton level.
And as I've argued wages are the problem not the transfer fee but we'll have to agree to disagree.
This guy stinks and I can't believe he is only 24. He should have never gone to United after Dortmund, City or Arsenal would have suited him better.
What happens if Sancho and Chelsea cannot agree personal terms on any permanent move? Would that nullify our agreement with them?
No one in their right mind would offer a fraction of what he is on now with us.
Even Saudi won’t want to touch him with a ten foot pole. Anyway, I think Chelsea will sign him, give him another season to buckle up, then probably send him on a bunch of loans. What a waste of space.Chelsea will pay the penalty and send him back to us.
The "what he is on now" shouldn't really feature a lot in his thinking because next season is the last year of his contract with Man Utd and apart from Saudi, no one will pay him that.
His Chelsea career doesn’t look great, he’s showing squad rotation player at best. In short, Sancho doesn’t have the skill set for the PL and has been overhyped.
People are mentioning his career has flopped possibly due to video game addiction, which could be true but there’s another possibility.
Sancho never had the skillet for a big club. City let him go to Dortmund where he thrived playing alongside Haaland. You can see Haaland bulldozing through teams which he doesn’t do now at City. Was it his teammates or Sancho going through good form?
We bit the bullet and bought him when no other team wanted to pay that much. His short quick plays was good but he couldn’t accelerate or have the defensive work rate required. He isn’t the Vinny JR type of player where you can justify the need not to trackback.
He was loaned again to Dortmund where apparently because he dribbled Nuno Mendes many times, he was back and it was United the problem. However he never really created anything and Dortmund backed out.
His Chelsea career doesn’t look great, he’s showing squad rotation player at best. In short, Sancho doesn’t have the skill set for the PL and has been overhyped.
Strong mentals and personality, to start withWhat is the skillset needed for a big club?
Strong mentals and personality, to start with
Please get your facts straight. Sancho played four seasons in Dortmund, far longer than Haaland. He earned his spot years before Haaland arrived and looked good playing together with a bunch of different people.Sancho never had the skillet for a big club. City let him go to Dortmund where he thrived playing alongside Haaland.
Here is where i disagree. I would Pay 10 mil in order to avoid paying 24 mil and Sancho's wagesI think it’ll be closer to 20m than 24. If the penalty is the rumoured 10m to get no player, vs 20 to get said player, surely they just take the player. He isn’t absolutely dogshit or anything, he’s still a serviceable player.
I love every few posts is one of theseThis is not true. Last year, he had only 2 assists. This year, he already has 6 assists for Chelsea. At this rate of growth, in 2 years, he'll be banging in 54 assists/season. I have full confidence in Chelsea & Maresca to bring the best out of him.
Probably neglects showers for more game time.This guy stinks and I can't believe he is only 24. He should have never gone to United after Dortmund, City or Arsenal would have suited him better.
I imagine the terms where agreed beforehand. Anything else doesn't make sense.What happens if Sancho and Chelsea cannot agree personal terms on any permanent move? Would that nullify our agreement with them?
No one in their right mind would offer a fraction of what he is on now with us.
I imagine the terms where agreed beforehand. Anything else doesn't make sense.
Elite level mentality more than anything.What is the skillset needed for a big club?
Even if it was, I doubt we’d make up the other half through a saleI wonder what the penalty fee for not signing him permanently will be. I reckon it should be at least 50% of the agreed signing fee.
Even if it was, I doubt we’d make up the other half through a sale
I was surprised Chelsea even took him in the first place but I can’t see any huge interest this summer. Maybe Turkish teams or Italian teams who just want to loan with no fees, the tight bastards