Don't forget the notion that he was only good because he was given time, thus any manager will be just as good if given enough time.
In all fairness this is often misconstrued as this. I've more often than not seen it used in the context of
"if the greatest ever struggled initially and needed time to turn the club, culture and results around, then it's reasonable that less managers may also have a difficult start"
I know it's tempting to take this on as "any manager can be saf, if given the time"
But that really isn't how I see it framed. I also see a player like Garnacho get compared to Ronaldo in a similar way - if Ronaldo needed time to get going and was one of the greatest ever, it isn't damning on Garna that he has levels to go up, given his age"
It's not saying he'll be as good as Ronaldo or even remotely close. It's saying that if the nest need time then so do the rest.
Obviously you can't just blindly apply this. All the time and support in the world won't see me become a Manchester United player.
But I do understand the point. As does the great man himself. Which is why he told the crowd to back the new manager and give them time during his leaving speech.
But football online is incredibly binary. Someone is good or they're terrible. Just look at how angry, personal and aggressive so many people are when someone makes a mistake. Mainoo getting called out, Garnacho getting called out, managers getting a month two before kick offs start happening.
When fans say "we need to be ruthless and it's going to take time" I really feel like they mean "make decisions that personally make me happy and get things sorted within 5 games"
I've seen post after post after post which state the project will need "time". Time in this sense means 3-5 Windows and likely 18 months - 3/4 years.
This is time the greatest manager ever needed to overhaul the club. If it took him a few years, why is a rookie from Portugal that's delaying with a completely different beast in how football is now compared to the 80s,gping to have it all sorted within a couple of months of coming in mid season?
That doesn't mean he's "the guy". It doesn't mean he'll get anywhere close to what SAF achieved or what he was capable of. It means it's not unreasonable that he may need longer than he's had before the support gets pulled right from beneath his feet.
That goes for anyone. I don't believe there is a single manager in world football who would come in now and achieve a 75% win rate until the end of the season. Whoever "the guy" is, they're going to need some time.
Our club's history and success literally tells this story and the likeness is drawn because when fans now say that he's not done it fast enough, they also said the exact same thing before
If I you ask me to get my vw to do 0-100 in 2 seconds and I say it can't, and point out that even a porsche needs 3 seconds and so it's not a reasonable demand, I wouldn't expect you to then start arguing that I'm saying the two cars are the same because I'm not. I hsit don't think it's sensible to expect worse things to achieve faster and better results than better things.
I know I've over explained this but I just see this exact argument so many times that I think people really miss the point entirely a lot of time.
We're so up the creek that this is far beyond a guy coming in, making a few tactical changes and boom, we're back fighting for top 4. I have no idea if Amorim is the guy but I do know the size of the task he has to undertake isn't too far off what Fergoe had. So I have zero anticipation that Amorim can turn it around in a few months, I just don't think anyone can, Fergie couldn't and he's the best to ever do it IMO. The expectation on Amorim is not the same Moyes. It can't be. Amorim has inherited the worst team, situation and circumstance of any United manager in the last 40 years. Few months mid season simply won't cut it.