‘No options’ is subjective. We could have just loaned someone else. Anyone thinking sensibly would not have classified Weghorst as ‘an option’ in the first place. Then what do we do?
And people keep mentioning a lack of finances. Weghorst wasn’t free! In fact, he cost around about what most 6 month loans would probably cost. Nobody seems to want to accept the fact that we found ourselves needing a short term striker and in those circumstances, our manager CHOSE Weghorst. That’s it. He wanted him here, he moved for him fairly early, and he wasn’t just waiting available - we had to go and negotiate with Besiktas and then pay them to get him. This is totally on the manager.
If WW really wasn’t wanted you would have seen that in how he was used. If he was considered not good enough then he’d have been there to provide a bench option, rather than straight into the lineup. Before the World Cup we played Rashford upfront in Martial’s absence. Our manager clearly decided that this was a better alternative. Strangely.