Robbie Boy
Full Member
Love how you put these just because they line up with your theory.
Would any top club have appointed Lampard? No.
Would any top club have hired Rodgers when Liverpool did? No.
Would any top club have hired Pelligrini? No.
Would any top club have hired Arteta? No.
Just because the rivals found their current manager to be the right one, doesnt meant they too havent been through bad managerial choices.
You are talking about clubs who have kept changing managers compared to one that doesnt know what to do when one is not successful.
Oh the agenda is strong with this one. Funnily enough though, Pelligrini managed to win the league. My point was that we have gone for four poor appointments. The only one I personally wanted was Mourinho but really he should have come straight after Fergie.
So when Liverpool realised that Rodgers wasn't up to the task, what did they do? Appoint Klopp. When Mourinho went full metal jacket, who was Chelsea's next permanent manager? Conte. When Pellegrini was deemed not good enough, what did City do? Hire Guardiola. Funny that every one of those managers then brought some form of success. We have now got rid of Mourino and downgraded with Ole.
And yeah, I mentioned Emery, Arteta too but who cares about Arsenal really? As for Lampard? Well he's there less time than Ole and ahead of us in the league.