Then tell me how you've read me saying 1) "We need a new number 9" and "Martial is the best number 9 we currently have" are not mutually exclusive statements.", followed by 2) " the strong signs that Martial is the manager's first choice ahead of Ronaldo (one of the best goalscorers in the history of the game and still a potent finisher)
and twisted it into me saying the fact he's been picked ahead of Ronaldo right now is " is something of an indictment to support his long term inclusion". This thread is about picking our best front three right now, and loads of people have laid out precisely why it is that they think Martial (despite his long-established weaknesses) is the best option to lead the line. You don't want him at the club - that's great, but he's here, and if you're going to say you're baffled to see so many people including him in the XI, you will be expected to offer an alternative beyond "toss Hugill in there to stick chances away" (worth pointing out here that neither Ronaldo nor Martial were "completely untried and untested" when they made their debuts for us - both had at least a season of top-division football under their belts before we signed them for eight-figure fees).
You're making up your own arguments to win, just like you did in the exchange from post #220 onwards where someone else tried to engage with you.