Feck me...When you realise this thread is 2 years old.
I was going to say that Cavani might be an option, but I checked his stats and he hasn't played on the right since 13/14 (and that was the only season he really played there). So scratch that.
For some reason I had it in my head that he'd played there a decent amount over the years.
Not really considering neither of them are realistically for this year.Because we signed 2.
Could have been 5 years old and would still be fittingWhen you realise this thread is 2 years old.
Only in the first year they were there together (13/14). In the following two seasons he played on the left. At least according to Transfermarkt.Didn’t he play there the whole time Ibra was there?
Did no one tell you folks? Telles is the new Gareth Bale.
Attacking LB to devastating, free scoring right sided forward.
If only life were that simple!
Needed a CB and a RW. Signed none.
Clowns running the show
Did no one tell you folks? Telles is the new Gareth Bale.
Attacking LB to devastating, free scoring right sided forward.
If only life were that simple!
Then we should've signed a right sided wide forward then?United play narrow front 3 of wide-forwards. We haven't had a right-winger in years.
You can argue about whether that's the best tactical approach or not. But in the existing United context, right-wing is not the hole in our formation that many believe it to be.
Even if Sancho had signed, I reckon he would have played in the same areas of the pitch as Greenwood (ie. 15 yards inside of the wing). We'd have gained something in chance creation, but lost just as much in goal scoring. At best, it was swings and roundabouts.
The goals come from the front 3. The creativity comes from midfield. The width comes from the full-backs. That's what Ole has been building since he's been here.
Then we should've signed a right sided wide forward then?
United play narrow front 3 of wide-forwards. We haven't had a right-winger in years.
You can argue about whether that's the best tactical approach or not. But in the existing United context, right wing is not the hole in our formation that many believe it to be.
Even if Sancho had signed, I reckon he would have played in the same areas of the pitch as Greenwood (ie. 15 yards inside of the wing). We'd have gained something in chance creation, but lost just as much in goal scoring. At best, it was swings and roundabouts.
The goals come from the front 3. The creativity comes from midfield. The width comes from the fullbacks. That's what Ole has been building since he's been here.
We did. In fact we signed 2. And we already have one. The reason I felt we needed a winger wasn't because we lacked quality in our first six, but because an injury to them would force us to use james lingard or mata. In addition, rashford can be off form and Greenwood may have those periods as he is young. Cavani can also play there.Then we should've signed a right sided wide forward then?
They begged us not to get him, Rodriguez or dembele, because it was "embarassing". For a team rebuilding we are big snobs.Bale?
Martial, Rashford and Greenwood are all very similar players. They're at their livliest about 35 yards from goal, dribbling with the ball at their feet, with the opposition defence in front of them.Then we should've signed a right sided wide forward then?
They begged us not to get him, Rodriguez or dembele, because it was "embarassing". For a team rebuilding we are big snobs.
You mean the young ones we got today? We at least needed someone to go in to the first team if Mason gets injured or fails to produce the goods for too long (ideally we wanted someone to go in ahead of Greenwood). I'd be surprised if they're that level, so yeah, it's likely to be Mata, James and Lingard, which is the problem.We did. In fact we signed 2. And we already have one. The reason I felt we needed a winger wasn't because we lacked quality in our first six, but because an injury to them would force us to use james lingard or mata. In addition, rashford can be off form and Greenwood may have those periods as he is young. Cavani can also play there.
Only one of them looks remotely capable on the right though and he's very inexperienced and no one would be shocked if he badly lost form.Martial, Rashford and Greenwood are all very similar players. They're at their livliest about 35 yards from goal, dribbling with the ball at their feet, with the opposition defence in front of them.
We're looking equally lost at sea with Martial out-of-form.Only one of them looks remotely capable on the right though and he's very inexperienced and no one would be shocked if he badly lost form.
But we've got Cavani and Ighalo who can play there.We're looking equally lost at sea with Martial out-of-form.
More importantly, we've been found out by the other teams in the league. Having two contrasting but potent plans of attack is better than having a single plan with superior backups.
You mean the young ones we got today? We at least needed someone to go in to the first team if Mason gets injured or fails to produce the goods for too long (ideally we wanted someone to go in ahead of Greenwood). I'd be surprised if they're that level, so yeah, it's likely to be Mata, James and Lingard, which is the problem.
I doubt at Cavani's age we're gonna play him wide.
You're supposed to take your punts on youth whilst also having a reliable first team squad. If they then become good enough to play regularly and you no longer need one of the reliable older players, happy days, but you should not just assume they will straight away.Our fans have blasted the club constantly for not signing the sancho's before they join dortmund. We have this time. We signed two in fact, both of whom play on the right for relatively cheap prices. Yet the true nature of those fans come out because as much drivel as they talk about not wanting to have blockbuster signings anymore, they complain when that doesn't happen. Fergie had, maybe four or five windows in which he made those blockbuster signings. Cantona in 1992, Veron in 2001/2002, Rio in 2003 and Van Persie in 2012.