Pep inherited what was perhaps the greatest team of youth system players at Barcelona. He then went to what is ostensibly a one team league (where he could pick from his closest rivals best players) and then to an organisation that outspend football clubs to sports wash their owners grubby family. For me, Pep isn't even in the conversation.
Klopp is clearly the better manager and only second to SAF in the last 3 decades, the job he's done for the dippers is incredible.
This is how I see it as well.
Pep is clearly a very good manager but he has a really poor record in knock out football if you assess it without any bias at City outside of the Coca Cola cup:
CL: Chelsea, Monaco, Lyon, Spurs, Pool
FA Cup: Chelsea, Arsenal x2, Wigan
Worth noting the single FA cup win he has consisted of this unbelievably fortunate run (4th round to Final): Rotherham, Burnley, Newport, Swansea, Brighton, Watford.
His greatest ever team remains, by some distance, his first and he’s thrown so much money at City now it’s a meme. 3/5 PL, 1/5 FA 0/5 CL is that a great record for his managerial seat? Particularly when you factor in the traditional CL giants are dead (it’s basically Bayern who are still elite and arguably PSG) & he’s only ever really had Klopp (working on vastly smaller budget and leaner squad) as a challenger. Tuchel at Chelsea might be the first time he’s actually got an adversary on equal footing since Real beat his Barca team to the title and he quit.
I rate how he wants to play the game but feel he now has a track record of overthinking/trying to be too clever in big games and hasn’t dominated to the level I would have expected him to.
As much as I hate the scousers, what Klopp has done is by far the best as an all round manager. Won both major trophies, attacking football, developed more players, smaller squad, far less money, arguably just as influential stylistically.