Who would you prefer to win the Premier League of Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City?

Why aren't Chelsea as hated as City? They're basically the City before Man City, and Abramovich was a known robber baron with Putin ties.

Liverpool look like they lack depth, their fullbacks aren't great like City and their attack heavily relies on Salah's playmaking. Chelsea look a credible threat but I keep hearing that the GK is bad? They have the most in-form attack. Arsenal rely too much on corners and won't score enough, City need to blow 500m on midfielders and fullbacks in January.
 
Easily Chelsea. They never really got me wound up, even in the seasons where we were competing against each other for titles. Maybe because unlike Arsenal, they had a great team but didn't go on like they had invented football.

Next Arsenal. Their fans are obnoxious and I despised the club from 98 to 04 under Wenger because they were our closest rival. Like I said above, they way they went on, it was like they had invented football. But my hatred of them has waned over the past 20 years, probably because we pretty much battered Wenger for the last 10 years of his Arsenal reign, I actually nearly felt sorry for him in the end!

I hate City but given the choice between them and the Scousers, they'd just about be the more tolerable option (although what a terrible choice!). Maybe Mancs might feel differently but where I am, I'm surrounded by Liverpool fans, nothing would give me more joy then them bottling the league this season, I would never let them forget it!
 
City winning 5 in a row wouldn't be a factor for me at all. They've already won 4 in a row which we've never done, so what difference would 5 make?

Liverpool getting to 20 titles would be a kick in the balls though, it's one of the things we have over them and it took a long time to get there!
 
lexisonfire said:
Why aren't Chelsea as hated as City? They're basically the City before Man City, and Abramovich was a known robber baron with Putin ties.

Liverpool look like they lack depth, their fullbacks aren't great like City and their attack heavily relies on Salah's playmaking. Chelsea look a credible threat but I keep hearing that the GK is bad? They have the most in-form attack. Arsenal rely too much on corners and won't score enough, City need to blow 500m on midfielders and fullbacks in January.
Click to expand...
Their fans are by and large one of the more normal sets of fans. Dippers have a victim complex, Arsenal fans are obnoxious and City fans, when you can find them, seem to have an inferiority complex.
 
Chelsea. If they were to do it, Maresca’s ability to turn that mess around should be praised. My Chelsea-supporting pal doesn’t think they have the defence to win the league.
 
Would you rather eat shit, poison, raw chicken with salmonela, or 9000 days old yoghurt?
Or.. you can just ignore those and don't care about it. Only caring when the food is actually proper good.
 
Probably Chelsea followed by Arsenal. Really don't want too see the scousers win it ever but it's down to those three now, as far as I'm concerned. You'd have to think City are out of the running.
 
Loon said:
Chelsea. If they were to do it, Maresca’s ability to turn that mess around should be praised. My Chelsea-supporting pal doesn’t think they have the defence to win the league.
Click to expand...

They really don't unless they strengthen in Jan. They've got only one decent defender in Colwill.
 
lexisonfire said:
Why aren't Chelsea as hated as City? They're basically the City before Man City, and Abramovich was a known robber baron with Putin ties.

Liverpool look like they lack depth, their fullbacks aren't great like City and their attack heavily relies on Salah's playmaking. Chelsea look a credible threat but I keep hearing that the GK is bad? They have the most in-form attack. Arsenal rely too much on corners and won't score enough, City need to blow 500m on midfielders and fullbacks in January.
Click to expand...
Because they were never considered as the best team in the world for a sustained period like City. You get much more hate when you’re dominant for long.
 
Every year we have this type of thread and probably will continue the next 20 years, sigh, the state of our club.
 
Man City and Arsenal not gonna winning it. I just cant see how. Its between Liverpool and Chelsea with Liverpool being heavy favorite.
 
The problem with Chelsea winning is it gives every billionaire a blue print to a get a rabid following and an invitation to buy clubs. Chelsea showed it just takes 1.5 billion in investment in squad and 4.5 billion to buy a club to win the league. This is pocket change to a lot of billionaires in the world now. Even a billion more in investment in squad is quite feasible.

Chelsea fans I know worship Boehly and Roman before him. It is really annoying that every conversation turns in to how Boehly is the smartest person in sport at present. I don't want every fan base to be like that. At least Arsenal fans are fans of the club itself. It is Arsenal for me.
 
My personal order of preference amongst Man Utd plus those 4 clubs:

Man Utd > Arsenal > Chelsea > Liverpool > Man City. During my child-hood Man Utd and Arsenal were the top dogs, and I have fond memories of that era. In 2018/2019 I wanted City to beat Liverpool in the title race. By 2021/2022, I was sick of City, and wanted Liverpool to beat them.

As someone that doesn't support a team in the Premier League, let alone one of the heavyweights, I want as many strong teams and contenders as possible, for both the title and Champions League qualification races, and therefore as much excitement and drama there as possible.
 
People are picking Chelsea?!

The Chelsea whose fans chanted Roman Abramovich's name during a minute's applause for Ukraine after Russia invaded the country?

United fans, supposedly against everything City stand for, still choose Chelsea out of these four? Wow.

Think I need to take a good break from this site.
 
Man Utd > Arsenal > Chelsea > 115 Charges FC > Liverpool

Don't wanna see Liverpool equal our records of 20 league titles, but they'll most likely win it this year.
 
Steffa Barnesa said:
People are picking Chelsea?!

The Chelsea whose fans chanted Roman Abramovich's name during a minute's applause for Ukraine after Russia invaded the country?

United fans, supposedly against everything City stand for, still choose Chelsea out of these four? Wow.

Think I need to take a good break from this site.
Click to expand...


Chelsea is now owned by freedom loving Venture Capitalists.
 
Chelsea.

Arsenal fans are just the absolute worst, as is Arteta. Total victim complex.

Liverpool & City - obvious reasons as to why not.
 
Tallis said:
Chelsea is now owned by freedom loving Venture Capitalists.
Click to expand...

So? The legacy is still there, the reason they're where they are today is because of the same guy. If City are taken over tomorrow I'm not just going to forget the previous 16 years. If you would, that's your business.
 
Steffa Barnesa said:
So? The legacy is still there, the reason they're where they are today is because of the same guy. If City are taken over tomorrow I'm not just going to forget the previous 16 years. If you would, that's your business.
Click to expand...

I was just being sarcastic. I don't really have any stance here. All the best.
 
Probably City as I'm not bothered with them. They are not a real club.

Never Liverpool.
I detest Chelsea.
Arsenal not winning it would just be funny.
 
Steffa Barnesa said:
People are picking Chelsea?!

The Chelsea whose fans chanted Roman Abramovich's name during a minute's applause for Ukraine after Russia invaded the country?

United fans, supposedly against everything City stand for, still choose Chelsea out of these four? Wow.

Think I need to take a good break from this site.
Click to expand...
It's not like that though. If it was just about what's morally the correct everyone on here would choose Liverpool over City. But that's not the case because of how annoying the fans are/historical rivalry etc
 
Chelsea by quite some distance. then probably City as it just feels a bit meh when they win stuff. Then Arsenal....................... and Liverpool are last by quite some distance.
 
Chelsea - they're pretty irrelevant really so the best option.

City aren't a real club so their success is meaningless (though pundits still celebrate them like they are); Arsenal are a real club plus full of twats, and Liverpool are obviously the worst people in the world, so that's pretty much my order of preference.
 
Chelsea is the clear answer, it makes almost zero sense and they can just as easily utterly implode next year for no reason.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.