Actually it's not a stupid point. You're shifting the goalposts here. You asked how we would be able to attract top players with a manager like Moyes. Well Mata is a top player (whether or not we needed isn't really the point, at least as far your initial question goes.) If we were able to sign him (again it doesn't matter if Moyes was ultimately responsible for it; we signed him with his knowing that he would be playing for Moyes,) then there is no real evidence to suggest we won't be able to sign top players due to Moyes' presence.
As Kid Moyes said in answering the question that you asked (your disagreeing doesn't mean he didn't answer,) money is most likely to be the determining factor in getting players to come to United.
Yes, but did we need Mata more than he needed us? Mata probably would have gone anywhere cos
he needed to play. And the board thought they needed a signing to get the fans off Moyes' back for doing such a terrible job and he was available. Plus Mata knows he will still be around if Moyes rightfully gets sacked in the summer.
Did Moyes attract any players that we really needed last summer? No, he didn't and we got Fellaini. And why else would we sign Mata when we needed players in other positions? He wasn't exactly a priority, was he? We could have tried to sign Matic, a midfielder who we needed more than Mata, since we already have Rooney and Kagawa. Matic was available in January and we didn't even make a bid for him.
All of that is irrelevant since we're not talking about whether we needed him, we're talking about whether big players will sign for moyes. People were saying no big player would sign for moyes blah blah and then looked like total idiots when one of the biggest players in the whole league signed for him. If you believe that Fergie signed Mata I don't even know what to tell you, get a reality check, Fergie didn't manage man united in January (right?????!!!)
So if SAF had nothing to do with signing him, Moyes broke our transfer record on a player we didn't actually need?
But as you can see above, Mata signed for us cos
he needed to play. No doubt he's a good player, but strengthening his position was not a priority, far from it. There are other areas where we really need new players.
And let's face it, he was desperate to get out of Chelsea and go anywhere. A total idiot would ignore why he really signed for us or believe Mata came to us cos Moyes was in charge.
And don't forget SAF has great signings and rubbish ones. Not saying Moyes will do anywhere near as well as SAF, because I don't think he will, but not every signing will be great even for the best managers.
All managers make good or bad signings. But if they are the wrong player in the first place, like an average, slow, overpriced midfielder who sometimes plays up front as a battering ram, then it's never going to work out, is it? Did SAF play Veron in his best position? Or Kleberson, Djemba? Yes, he did and they weren't good enough.