You seem to have an issue with Scott's films being "flat and boring", on top of him being "ass". Whatever that means.
Soderbergh (who is a director that has made a few films I enjoy) is well known to make rather slow, meticulous, emotionless often films.
In general, I think people who have seen several Scott films and several Soderbergh films would associate the term "flat and boring" with one rather than the other - and not the one you seem to, hence the use of the word "strange". It obviously had nothing to do with one of them making films you like more, I understand how a "your favourite film director" thread works.
Yeah it's a fine film. Not an all-time classic but it holds up ok, there's just a bit of revisionism going on.