- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
- Messages
- 472
Sancho > Neves > CB
Sancho > Neves > CB
As in £20m extra than Maguire totalling £105m?
I think Sancho is more important to secure, but I don't think we can be confident of comfortably finishing in the top four and winning any trophies without signing both.
I think when we bring James, Mata, Lingard etc into the side it is clear that we lose a significant amount of threat on goal. Signing a CB and being more solid will obviously win us points, but having an alternative if the forwards are having an off day would win us more points IMO. However much you need a good defence to achieve things in this league, it is proven that scoring more goals gets you places. The four sides that are above us are there because they have scored more goals than we have. Despite our apparent fragility, our defence is comparable to everyone else - only Liverpool have conceded fewer goals than us. I think this side has proven that its best form of defence is attack so I feel going more gung-ho is going to benefit us more in the long-term and fit the way Ole is trying to do things.
Sancho is a must and needs to be completed ASAP, but a CB would not be far behind at all either.
Edit: Just for comparison
Team GF GA Liverpool 77 29 Man City 93 35 Chelsea 64 49 Leicester 67 39 Man Utd 63 35
Yep, this squad as it is has the capability to do very well. However, a lot of our players seem to have the habit of being injured and missing weeks (thus an amount of games reaching 5+). This doesn't seem to happen at Liverpool, but it does at the other teams and with the exception of Man City you can tell. This is why we need the additional attacking player and players to be in good physical condition as much as possible.Looking at this table, If you take City out of it, we are not in bad shape in attack either. City get a lot of goals because they never stop attacking even if games are won.
Of our 4 main players who would be expected to contribute in attack;
Pogba - Missed the season pretty much
Bruno - Signed half way
Rashford - Missed a month through injury
Martial - Missed 2 month through injury
You would assume next season, we could catch up on Liverpool if most of the above players remain healthy. Leicesters numbers are hugely skewed by that 9-0 win.
We need both Sancho and a CB.
100 percent Sancho. We could manage for another season with the center backs we have right now. They are fairly decent centre backs, but the most important thing is that they are centre backs and could play every game barring unlikely injuries.60 percent Sancho. 40 percent quality CB.
This.Sancho > Matic replacement > CB
You think we’ll sell 13 players and sign 7?Not just 2, what about a team reset? People might say this as a muppet dream but I do feel we need a window like this after 7 years of average signings.
Alexis(15)/Mata(10)/Lingard(15)/Perrera(15)/Rojo(10)/Smalling(20)/Jones(10)/Baily(20)/Dalot(20)/ DDG(30) and then Pogba(80)/Lindelof(30)/James(15)=+290M
Jimenez(40)/Sancho(70)/Grealish(50)/Vanbeek(50)/Saul(70)/Konate(40)/Upamecano(40)= -360
With 70M Net spend we can vastly improve our squad and if you like to keep Pogba we can ignore VanBeek signing.
Even Thiago/Kroos/Rakatic for 30M price can be a stop gap option for 8-role and Grealish can cover Bruno's role until Hannibal develops.
-------------------------------------------------------Martial / Jimenez -------------------------------------
------Rashford/Grealish-------------------Bruno/Hannibal--------------Sancho/Mason--------
---------------------------VanBeek/Fred----------------------Saul/Matic+SMT ----------------------------------
Shaw/Williams------------Maguire/AT-----------Konate/Upamecano------------AWB/Mensah----
--------------------------------------------------Henderson/Romero--------------------------------------------------------
You guys see any improvement with this team ?
You think we’ll sell 13 players and sign 7?
Spin off from the "what do we still need" thread, where I felt we ensure we get a top center back over Sancho (if it came to choosing between the two of course). An example reply is below, and I'm just curious what the thoughts of the caf are on this. Sure Sancho is a top player but I wouldn't want his introduction to come at the opportunity cost of a top defender.
To reply to this - we aren't winning shit with the defence as it stands, as it's just too weak. That doesn't mean its a "minor" flaw in the defence, it's actually quite major.
Not just 2, what about a team reset? People might say this as a muppet dream but I do feel we need a window like this after 7 years of average signings.
Alexis(15)/Mata(10)/Lingard(15)/Perrera(15)/Rojo(10)/Smalling(20)/Jones(10)/Baily(20)/Dalot(20)/ DDG(30) and then Pogba(80)/Lindelof(30)/James(15)=+290M
Jimenez(40)/Sancho(70)/Grealish(50)/Vanbeek(50)/Saul(70)/Konate(40)/Upamecano(40)= -360
With 70M Net spend we can vastly improve our squad and if you like to keep Pogba we can ignore VanBeek signing.
Even Thiago/Kroos/Rakatic for 30M price can be a stop gap option for 8-role and Grealish can cover Bruno's role until Hannibal develops.
-------------------------------------------------------Martial / Jimenez -------------------------------------
------Rashford/Grealish-------------------Bruno/Hannibal--------------Sancho/Mason--------
-----------------------------------VanBeek/Fred----------------------Saul/Matic+SMT ---------------------
Shaw/Williams--------Maguire/AT-------Konate/Upamecano-----------AWB/Mensah-------
--------------------------------------------------Henderson/Romero---------------------------------------------------
You guys see any improvement with this team ?
Fully agree with this. If we're in the CL next season, we need quality in squad depth at both ends of the pitch.Sancho. While I don't particularly rate any of our CBs highly, I think that they are competent enough that we can manage. Good coaching and organisation can make a huge difference defensively moreso than going forward.
In the attacking area, we are one injury away from playing Dan James, who I think is way off the standard
Maguire's fans surely saw him as one of the best options in the world. I was less keen on spending that kind of money. I thought he was too slow. I also thought United should sign VVD long before 'Pool went for him. I think while he was still at Celtic! I feel personally vindicated. Just shows how important stats are. Stats don't give the whole picture but they don't lie much (unless they are badly compiled).There are no top centre backs. There is a dearth of them tbh. Maguire was expensive but was largely seen as one of the best options in the world.
Get Sancho. Try and outscore the better teams.
This.We need an idea how to control the ball. Southampton and Chelsea showed us our weakness.
I have no idea what this part means. Do you think that instead of signing Sancho, we should sign 25 players? Or what?Maguire's fans surely saw him as one of the best options in the world. I was less keen on spending that kind of money. I thought he was too slow. I also thought United should sign VVD long before 'Pool went for him. I think while he was still at Celtic! I feel personally vindicated. Just shows how important stats are. Stats don't give the whole picture but they don't lie much (unless they are badly compiled).
United's weakness is squad depth. The squad is 25 players. Sancho is 1 player. Sancho won't fix the weakness.