yo@Kirk
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 376
Man United's second half performance against Chelsea was about as good as I've seen against a top six team this season. Seems Lingard fits the second AM role in a midfield square pretty good. His movement, passing accuracy, finishing, and work ethic seem well suited for the position. Seems to fit Pogba and Matic pretty good too.
I fail to see the logic in changing schemes every match. A club as big as Man United should play a scheme that fits their personnel and make other teams adjust to United's scheme and personnel. Logic suggests that if United would play and practice a scheme that fits it's personnel every match, the performances would consistently improve for the players and the team alike. That's why I would likes to see the midfield square used against Palace tomorrow because we've had a week to identify problems and correct them. If the scheme and personnel that performed well in the second half vs Chelsea is used vs Palace, that scheme and personnel should perform even better for the whole match vs Palace after a week of preparation and practice.
I fail to see the logic in changing schemes every match. A club as big as Man United should play a scheme that fits their personnel and make other teams adjust to United's scheme and personnel. Logic suggests that if United would play and practice a scheme that fits it's personnel every match, the performances would consistently improve for the players and the team alike. That's why I would likes to see the midfield square used against Palace tomorrow because we've had a week to identify problems and correct them. If the scheme and personnel that performed well in the second half vs Chelsea is used vs Palace, that scheme and personnel should perform even better for the whole match vs Palace after a week of preparation and practice.