TheRedHearted
Full Member
What about their scouting department specifically?Chelsea already stole a bunch of their footballing department...
What about their scouting department specifically?Chelsea already stole a bunch of their footballing department...
We hired a club builder in Rangnick to be a coach, and we hired a coach in ETH to be a club builder. Of course it was always going to end in tears.Agree with everything you've said.
There was this guy called Ralf Rangnick who has a proven track record of building clubs, identifying top talent and has access to an extensive network across much of Europe and South America.
But we all know what happened...
The moment the club announced he would be leaving, I feared that our recruitment woes would continue so I'm not really surprised we find ourselves in the same situation once again.
That to me was a fork in the road moment for this club.
What about their scouting department specifically?
We hired an advisor of women team to be a DoF.We hired a club builder in Rangnick to be a coach, and we hired a coach in ETH to be a club builder. Of course it was always going to end in tears.
We’ve got ambition in all the wrong placesOff the top of my head, they took Paul Winstanley who was their head of recruitment and was in charge of identifying talent so was very much involved in their scouting department.
But yeah I'm sure there are plenty of others we could poach, assuming our club ever displayed any real ambition.
Who would you like to see come in at CB and CM next summer just out of interest
What we need is to raise the technical and athletic level of the team. And the reason I say athletic level is because we aren't the best team at defending transitions. So players who have the athletic and physical capabilities will help us control or contain the opposition without the ball. It's why I was saying that someone like Amadou Onana would be a good option to have because he has the ability to win his duels in large spaces and also adds something on the ball via his ability to carry the ball through midfield. The Tottenham midfield had players who can carry and dribble the ball well, whilst also being quick and tenacious out of possession to thwart transitions.
We also lack a ball carrier with the class and guile in more advanced central areas of the pitch. Mount isn't too bad in that regard but Bruno isn't very good at at all at making space for himself in confined spaces. Hopefully Mainoo will help us in that regard in the mid to long-term.
And Rangnick didn't say anything that hasn't already been said. At Leipzig he constructed a deeper midfield two of players who were high energy runners like Laimer and Haidara. He also had the benefit of being backed by a multi billionaire who was one of the richest men in Europe. So it wasn't as difficult to get Leipzig into the Bindesliga when you have that sort of backing. And the same applies at Hoffenheim where their owner (Dietmar Hopp) put in almost half a billion of his own money into a village club like Hoffenheim which was always going to make a difference in getting them up into the top flight. Both RBL Leipzig and Hoffenheim were/are financially doped up and hence are disliked by German football fans from what I've read.
I don't know if it's possible under the Glazers but if we could sign both Amrabat and Amadou Onana I think it would make a difference to how we perform going forward in the current season. Kobbie Mainoo will hopefully be integrated into the team but I'd also bring Hannibal into the fold because he provides qualities which we lack like playing on the half turn and carrying/dribbling the ball through midfield.
All of those things you said about Rangnick may well be true, but that doesn't mean that he wasn't good at identifying top talent, especially at cheap prices.
I'm sure you know the names but for the benefit of anyone who doesn't remember - Alvarez, Enzo Fernandez, Gvardiol, Luis Diaz, Laimer, Nkunku, Vlahovic and Haaland (lol).
Out of those names mentioned, obviously many of them are players that he was familiar with through his RB connections, but others were good choices from the Primeira Liga and South America. What's also interesting about each of those players is that every single one of them bar Vlahovic has had their stock rice massively since he made those recommendations.
I am also not suggesting that each of them would have been appropriate players for our team, but I think Enzo and Alvarez in particular would have done wonders for our team.
When I see all the names we have been linked with under ETH (and for all of our other managers post-SAF), they are always obvious names that are well-established players, or players that the manager has worked extensively with before.
At least Rangnick showed some vision and left-field thinking.
First of all let's get something straight, Rangnick didn't identify talent but rather his role as the DoF was to put people in charge of a recruitment department to identify talent. For example, he had Christian Mockel as the head scout at Hoffenheim whose job it was to structure the recruitment at the club. And the same applied at RB Leipzig where the head of scouting was in charge of recruitment. Rangnick's role as the DoF was to oversee all the football departments and not just the recruitment department.All of those things you said about Rangnick may well be true, but that doesn't mean that he wasn't good at identifying top talent, especially at cheap prices.
I'm sure you know the names but for the benefit of anyone who doesn't remember - Alvarez, Enzo Fernandez, Gvardiol, Luis Diaz, Laimer, Nkunku, Vlahovic and Haaland (lol).
Out of those names mentioned, obviously many of them are players that he was familiar with through his RB connections, but others were good choices from the Primeira Liga and South America. What's also interesting about each of those players is that every single one of them bar Vlahovic has had their stock rice massively since he made those recommendations.
I am also not suggesting that each of them would have been appropriate players for our team, but I think Enzo and Alvarez in particular would have done wonders for our team.
When I see all the names we have been linked with under ETH (and for all of our other managers post-SAF), they are always obvious names that are well-established players, or players that the manager has worked extensively with before.
At least Rangnick showed some vision and left-field thinking.
We need at least two players before the window closes in my opinion.
Central midfielder: Casemiro is playing as a one man midfield at the moment and it's not working. We need to bring someone to play alongside him
Striker: Rashford is not a striker, Martial can't stay fit. Even if Hojlund is a big hit we still need to have a reliable second option to play up front.
These were our top two priorities in May. It is mad that we're here in late August with neither problem addressed.
ETH spent his CM budget on Mount. If it does not work then it is a sackable offence. MacAllister was available for a lower fee.We need at least two players before the window closes in my opinion.
Central midfielder: Casemiro is playing as a one man midfield at the moment and it's not working. We need to bring someone to play alongside him
Striker: Rashford is not a striker, Martial can't stay fit. Even if Hojlund is a big hit we still need to have a reliable second option to play up front.
ETH spent his CM budget on Mount. If it does not work then it is a sackable offence. MacAllister was available for a lower fee.
Buying Mount and Antony is a much bigger problem than not selling McTominay. If Höjlund does not work out we are in a lot of trouble.I think a lot of fans wanted Fred, Donny and McT moved on this summer. Fred has already gone and Donny looks set to leave. We have also put a price tag on McT which suggests we are open to selling and he didn't even get a minute yesterday.
I don't want to absolve Ten Hag of any blame but the reality is the club has been run so poorly for such a long time that we are a huge victim of buying overpriced players on huge contracts that are becoming difficult to move on.
In an ideal world I think Ten Hag would let Henderson, Maguire, McTominay, Donny, Martial all go but we need to bring in replacements. If we can't do that we are only weakening our squad further.
Buying Mount and Antony is a much bigger problem than not selling McTominay. If Höjlund does not work out we are in a lot of trouble.
Spending your CM budget on Mount is a huge problem since Mount is not a CM.I don't think buying Mount is a huge problem if we also bought in a CM. I mean, I'm not 100 percent convinced Mount will work out but it's been 2 games, absolutely ridiculous to judge him this early.
Antony I agree hasn't been brilliant so far but it was also the inept board that meant we spent 80+ million rather than 50 million earlier in the summer.
My point is if we could sell McTominay and Donny and replace them with Amrabat and maybe one other player the squad would be much better. The problems is we can't sell players for various reasons caused by how our club has been run over previous years.
Yep, this is obvious surely.A striker/proven goalscorer and another midfielder are a must
We need at least two players before the window closes in my opinion.
Central midfielder: Casemiro is playing as a one man midfield at the moment and it's not working. We need to bring someone to play alongside him
Striker: Rashford is not a striker, Martial can't stay fit. Even if Hojlund is a big hit we still need to have a reliable second option to play up front.
A striker/proven goalscorer and another midfielder are a must
Number 3, what do you mean that Chelsea didn’t invest in him?We've only ever needed 1 thing. A highly skilled DOF. It may sound too obvious but its a testament to how much Glazers just don't give a "f**k" about the club.
ETH is a decent coach but not skilled at building teams. Overmars did that at Ajax. He has done well recruiting former players. But lets take a laundry list at errors recently.
1. Antony was a terrible buy. You could have gotten 2 good EPL level players for his price. ETH made a terrible biased decision.
2. Didn't force a Maguire sell. Why not, publicize he is done, put him in the reserves.
3. Paying £54M for a player Chelsea was not willing to invest in and having 1 year left on the deal. Maybe it's good long term but still a bad short term decision.
4. Paying £64M plus 8M add-ons for an unproven young striker who's hurt? Maybe long term he develops, but that's a really bad bet to pay that much when you could fork out £25M and get an elite level player. But he's forced into this with previous bad investments of Mount and Antony.
5. Not getting rid of bad salaries of Maguire, Henderson, Bailly, Martial immediately last season, taking a short term financial hit but coming out ahead long term with more money to invest in rebuilding year 3 onwards.