Deductive reasoning would suggest you're gay
what constitutes a banning offense in the c.e. forum?
- Thread starter Kevrockcity
- Start date
Deductive reasoning would suggest you're gay
Can it Thomas, you spastic Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime.
I'm not a shrink, but I can say with some confidence that the bloke who shot all those college kids was a nutter..
Lets just call it a night before i lose my right to post in the Admin/Help forum as well.
Not to mention agreeing on the point that something is indeed wrong, had everything been right, there would'nt be so many school shootings in America.
Moving in the right direction, even though getting to the goalline will take many many years, is still better than not doing anything about it.
Not to mention agreeing on the point that something is indeed wrong, had everything been right, there would'nt be so many school shootings in America.
Moving in the right direction, even though getting to the goalline will take many many years, is still better than not doing anything about it.
first hit for "thomas" search in google:
First hit for "rrarraroon" on google was some spastic Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime on redcafe
doesn't change the fact that to move in the right direction, a better argument than "yanks are murdering spastics" needs to be composed. you are no better than the "sell Park" crowd who have no clue who to bring in his place.
and this has never applied here so why did you waste your time posting this?
aw that pic of choo choo getting to you i see
I'm not the one that has to lay down the guidelines, something both i and Americans are greatful for.
"Buhu it's difficult so there's no point in trying lets just give up", won't get us anywhere.
Whilst not wanting to get into a trend of defending the Noggie, that was probably more of a comment than an argument
how do you murder someone twice?
With a shovel
well put.
The right to bear arms - in this day and age is a rubbish - in a country where the Virginia episode is becomig a habbit - is it unjustifiable and indefensible. Until Americans accept this fact and do something positive to limit the ease in which criminals and the disturbed get weapons then, I predict, in the near future you will get US politicians weeping croc tears in another US campus following more killings.
George Bush promised to ammend US gun laws but did nowt - nuff said
George Bush promised to ammend US gun laws but did nowt - nuff said
This problem is connected with priority. Mental institutions have low priority an therefore smaller budgets. People with mental problems often declares healthy instead of been treathed orderly. Criminals with documented mental problems staying in prisons instead of being treathed on a mental institution (priority = cost more than a prison).
This is a problem in Norway, Sweden, USA and many other countrys.
Last! As a human being I have deepest sympathy for all involved in a tragedy. The timing is vital. There is no need for insulting comments, even if you have valid point.
True, it`s an economical priority. It`s not like Thomas said that you have to pass a lot of tests. According to "lov om psykisk helsevern" the main credential is that you are suffering from "a severe mental illness" and that "the outlooks for recovery will be higher if you are submitted". This is not a very tough credential, but keeping people in forced mental institutions is very costly.
It's not just an economical priority.
To admit someone against their will, you have to first convince one shrink that he should be in a mental institution, then you have to convince a board of shrinks.
Christopher Flynn has said they did as much as the law enabled them to do in order to help Cho.
Americans.. they make the law, they break the law. What's new?
Oh. btw, about other student's going into their car and stoping another shooting, guess what, they wouldn't have to do that in the first place if the other looney can't buy a gun in the 7-11.
Oh. btw, about other student's going into their car and stoping another shooting, guess what, they wouldn't have to do that in the first place if the other looney can't buy a gun in the 7-11.
I don't know anything about this actual case but in general there is allways a balance between the rights of individuals and the doctors diagnosis.
The problem is that nobody want's to take the responsibility for a young volatile person. The institution blame the law and say like Flynn. The educating system lacks resources. And if the family is instable or not present there is no help for all abandon young madmans.
It's just a sad development.
I don`t know what the law is in USA, so I can`t comment on that. But in Norway, the rules aren`t very strict to get into an institution. You need to be suffering from " a severe mental illness" but that`s almost about it. A lot of cases in media the last years about people being denied, have been because of economy.
Out of interest, a few of us United Forum hermits are wondering if a mod could clear up whether "logs.11" was banned for his comments on VA Tech, or something else?
BTW - Pissing myself at all the misguided fools who think the majority of Americans will listen if you point out complicated points such as "if you didn't all have guns you might not kill each other as much".
I gave that up ages ago.
I would say that I'm happy not to visit America too much, and leave them to it, but that could lead to people calling for my banning, so I won't.
I gave that up ages ago.
I would say that I'm happy not to visit America too much, and leave them to it, but that could lead to people calling for my banning, so I won't.
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&s...d=1&q=appalachian+law+school+shooting&spell=1
you can research it if you want. google search link for you.
he wasn't a student, either, but you conveniently failed to acknowledge that in your reply, didn't you?
that's an excellent idea.
by the way, the next time you doctor my name when quoting my posts, you'd do well to recognize that I'm a Canadian. As it stands, your unfounded and misplaced assumption of my nationality and callous remarks about my mental state only serve to exemplify that you are wholly incapable of having a serious discussion about any issue. Referring to me as an American nutjob is laughable, almost as much as you are.
i suspect he was banned for his association with SA but i could be wrong