Seems a conclusive victory for the notion he is a legend. That should put the debate to bed in all honesty.
To have the poll at all is unnecessary actually.
Seems a conclusive victory for the notion he is a legend. That should put the debate to bed in all honesty.
Still waiting in vain, after all these years, for Wayne's defenders to come up more substance than calling critics idiots, delusional, agenda-driven etc etc.
Best suffered from alcoholism though. That would have had a massive influence on his behaviour.Someone mentioned it earlier, but there's a certain amusing irony in people using his apparent disloyalty and indiscipline as a reason why he doesn't belong in the same category as players they never saw, and evidently know little about. George Best, for example, was frequently disciplined and fined for turning up to training (and occasionally even games) hungover or drunk, or not turning up at all! He even threatened to retire - twice! - in an attempt to sack off his obligations to the club, and left under a cloud in the season we were relegated. Yet he's rightly remembered as a top tier legend for the good things he did for us on the pitch, rather than the years of not giving a shit. Even watching people try to casually handwave the likes of Ronaldo, Rio or Keane flirting with other clubs as all kinds of different gravy is kinda cringey.
If we applied the same shifting subjective criteria to all our supposed legends we'd likely be left with just Sir Bobby and Scholes.
I think the reaction he gets when he comes back to OT will eclipse any other player I can think of.
I think the reaction he gets when he comes back to OT will eclipse any other player I can think of.
Best suffered from alcoholism though. That would have had a massive influence on his behaviour.
Rooney was cold blooded and threatened to join our bitter City rivals at the worst time possible. (City were becoming a force, tensions were high between the clubs and we were very reliant on Rooney; he was by far and away our best player at the time.)
Pretty sure it will. We'll just have to wait and seeIt won't eclipse the Ronaldo reception.
Aside from the fact he said he'd never join city
People well connected to the club confirmed it at the time.
Of course he wasn't going to come out and directly say it.
Pretty sure it will. We'll just have to wait and see
It won't eclipse the Ronaldo reception.
Someone mentioned it earlier, but there's a certain amusing irony in people using his apparent disloyalty and indiscipline as a reason why he doesn't belong in the same category as players they never saw, and evidently know little about. George Best, for example, was frequently disciplined and fined for turning up to training (and occasionally even games) hungover or drunk, or not turning up at all! He even threatened to retire - twice! - in an attempt to sack off his obligations to the club, and left under a cloud in the season we were relegated. Yet he's rightly remembered as a top tier legend for the good things he did for us on the pitch, rather than the years of not giving a shit. Even watching people try to casually handwave the likes of Ronaldo, Rio or Keane flirting with other clubs as all kinds of different gravy is kinda cringey.
If we applied the same shifting subjective criteria to all our supposed legends we'd likely be left with just Sir Bobby and Scholes.
People confirmed the transfer request and City declared interest.
Rooney said he'd have only gone abroad.
Now you're contradicting yourself from an earlier conversation with me. You were saying that Rooney wasn't a legend because he wanted to leave. I pointed out the fact that he didn't. Now you're saying the same thing that I did to support your argument about Gerard.He didn't though, he stayed with a club who offered him less money and less chance of winning trophies. He thought about it but even with a much better package on the table, decided to stay.
Don't get me wrong even the Legends have doubts and could be tempted. But what separates them from the rest is the loyalty, even when the grass is greener on the other side.
Now you're contradicting yourself from an earlier conversation with me. You were saying that Rooney wasn't a legend because he wanted to leave. I pointed out the fact that he didn't. Now you're saying the same thing that I did to support your argument about Gerard.
You're done
Now you're contradicting yourself from an earlier conversation with me. You were saying that Rooney wasn't a legend because he wanted to leave. I pointed out the fact that he didn't. Now you're saying the same thing that I did to support your argument about Gerard.
You're done
He doesn't think Pele, Maradona or Best are legends. Or Charlton, or Law. Or Zidane, or Buffon, or Luis Ronaldo. Or Cristiano Ronaldo, or Ronaldinho, or Beckenbauer, or Eusebio. Or anyone that played for more than one club (apart from Gerrard, weirdly).
He doesn't think that Danny Drinkwater or Jamie Vardy count as Leicester legends, and presumably Aguero or Kompany as City legends, or Henry or Bergkamp as Arsenal legends.
You're a hypocrite. You twist your answers to suit your argumentAm I "Done"? Each case is different, I'm able to differentiate. Sometimes it isn't just black and white. Rooney only stayed because, like I mentioned, we offered a perfect location, a great chance of winning almost everything and more money then he could spend. We basically left him with no choice. The difference with Gerrard was, he was being linked with Chelsea where he would have had almost everything better. I'm sure he was tempted, but in the end he took the less attractive package, sacrificed a LOT, i.e never winning the premiership, but in return is forever a Liverpool Legend. Something all the money in the world cant buy.
He's enhanced his legacy by leaving.
Great servant for the club.
If he had left 4 years ago when Fergie did he'd have been heralded alongside Charlton, Law, Best, Giggs.
On the pitch, as a player he was amazing and all about the club. As a person he was all about himself and his pay packet. For me, for this reason, he can never be a legend. Money was always more important to him than the club.
Oh, for Frogie's sake We're not gonna have 13 years of this debate, are we? Practically no-one is going to have their mind changed now, no matter what arguments are proferred.
For his defenders: his status is secure.
For his critics: he's gone - rejoice.
You're the same person who gives one club legends the same tag, as people like Vardy and Kompany
So only one club players can be legends. Wow.
So only one club players can be legends. Wow.
Yes, according to this clown only players who spent their entire careers at one club and were the best in their positions can be considered legends.
God forbid you make a lasting impact at a club you didn't grow up supporting, or a club you weren't good enough to see your career out at, because then you're automatically discounted from legend status.
Unless of course you're Steven Gerrard, whose decision to leave Liverpool for a New York paypacket doesn't count.
He's enhanced his legacy by leaving.
Great servant for the club.
If he had left 4 years ago when Fergie did he'd have been heralded alongside Charlton, Law, Best, Giggs.
Legends are more than stats. You can scor
You're the mercenary who has cheapened the word Legend so much that a player can play for 3 or 4 clubs, chase money like its going out of fashion, threaten to leave unless they get the best pay package and...............still be a legend to each one of the clubs they've played for lol.
Stats don't make you a legend my friend, to sit at the table among the footballing gods you have to offer a lot more. Your career.