Pogue, a mea culpa on my part. I’ve just gone back to listen and I definitely misheard something earlier. They are nowhere near as explicit as I make them out to be, and don’t declare it is explicitly Bruno Fernandes. I’m a little embarrassed, and hold my hands up.
But, I’m actually a little confused now, because Mitten clearly knows something and is substantiating Rooney’s claim as being valid, and Anka then defends any player (basically defends Bruno in all but name) who has a “busted hand” and/or who “cannot turn properly”, who essentially tells the manager he cannot play through his injuries again. It certainly implied to me on my first listen, and does again now, that Bruno not playing through an injury is being defended.
Are people hearing this differently?