Dex_Utd
Full Member
This thread is boring, most posters here have already made up their mind. If he doesn't score then he is $hit anyway, if he scores an important goal then all credit will go elsewhere. If all else fails then 300k a week is a good dig. Never mind the fact that we have been more $hit to watch when he doesn't play. Any decent set of supporters will support a striker at least temporarily scoring 2 match winning goals in 2 games, specially with the results coming after a long series of disappointing results. Yes criticise, but it will help if it seems to be proportionate.
Also 300-k a week is a boring argument now. In today's time it only covers the wages of 2 decent forward position players at the max, and the ones who will not play every game at any top club. Our back-up to him is Fellaini but somehow it is his fault. The blame for 300k, for us having no back-up, for us playing $hit even when he doesn't play, lies squarely with someone else.
Lets criticise by all means but let's also remember that he is playing for our club and let's not let the negativity and hate override the objectivity.
Also 300-k a week is a boring argument now. In today's time it only covers the wages of 2 decent forward position players at the max, and the ones who will not play every game at any top club. Our back-up to him is Fellaini but somehow it is his fault. The blame for 300k, for us having no back-up, for us playing $hit even when he doesn't play, lies squarely with someone else.
Lets criticise by all means but let's also remember that he is playing for our club and let's not let the negativity and hate override the objectivity.