Raw
Full Member
He seemed to look so much sharper for a few minutes after he scored, then he went back to being pretty crap.
Still, good goal.
Still, good goal.
I only saw the second half, but this strikes me as being way over the top.Shocking. Lucky he scored that goal or he'd have got a 1.
I only saw the second half, but this strikes me as being way over the top.
. That's because he hasn't scored in a while.Not seen him celebrate a goal like that in a while
Because he scored a goal. He's being built up again, but he gave another performance exactly in keeping with the rest of his performances this season. he was helped by having martial up front with him, but he did absolutely nothing until he scored.
He was never a 1/10 without the goal, don't be absurd. In the first half he was clearly much sharper, his passing was improved and he rarely lost the ball. Yes, the miss was a shocker and it was a relatively easy header for him, but that first post you made is laughable.
Because he scored a goal. He's being built up again, but he gave another performance exactly in keeping with the rest of his performances this season. he was helped by having martial up front with him, but he did absolutely nothing until he scored.
He was never a 1/10 without the goal, don't be absurd. In the first half he was clearly much sharper, his passing was improved and he rarely lost the ball. Yes, the miss was a shocker and it was a relatively easy header for him, but that first post you made is laughable.
Odd. He put Lingard through on goal in the first 15 minutes and linked midfield and attack very, very well. He was easily our best attacker.
I thought he was very good throughout, apart from some sloppiness in the last 5 minutes.
OK. We'll see. He looked better because we had 70% possession and were committing 5/6 players to every attack, but his overall contribution was again very small. He didn't create anything, and he's supposed to be the no.10, but I guess that's a great performance for some people.
Has anyone said it was 'great' performance? Not that I've read. Almost every post apart from yours in here since full time rates him as 'average', 'better' or 'good' and his rating so far is 6.5.
Odd. He put Lingard through on goal in the first 15 minutes and linked midfield and attack very, very well. He was easily our best attacker.
As I said, because he scored a goal. Imagine what the rating would be if it were somebody else nodding it in. He'd easily be below a 5. I gave him a 3, because at least he just lacked any kind of threat tonight, rather than giving the ball away every second touch.