Empire
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2013
- Messages
- 4,618
I don't really understand your point.
It is a fact that if Rooney was not there, the defender would have easily been able to clear or be calm. Yes he may still have back passed it. However Krul wouldn't have had to make a snap pass if rooney wasn't there. He would have had yeons to clear it peacefully. It is directly because rooney pressed them both that the situation panned out like it did. Whether it was 90% involvement in the goal I don't know.
I have already told you to and shown you in my post the credit was given to Rooney for pressing. If this was United who conceded the goal the blame would be on the defender who made the error and not credit to the attacker who pressed. Defenders often are pressed and usually they deal with that pressure from the striker.
And as for the 90% point, why then respond to my post? I responded to a post that said 'His finishing and touch let him down today, but he compensated with very high work rate. 90% of the goal is because of him.' I disagreed Rooney was 90% responsible for the goal…
rpitroda said:I can't forsee that if Rooney wasn't there that they would or wouldn't make the same mistakes but I can tell you for a fact that it would have been significantly more unlikely.
So now you're just repeating what I said in the very post to which you are responding?
had Rooney not pressured it was more likely the defender would clear the ball
rpitroda said:Furthermore just because Rooneys pressure will not always lead to a goal, it doesn't mean he isn't responsible. Every time he does that he creates the opportunity for a mistake. Just because a mistake isn't made every time doesn't therefore mean that when it is made he isn't that responsible for it.
I've already addressed this in previous posts.
it wasn't an unforced error due to Rooney's pressure
And to the very post you are responding to:
I've already credited Rooney for his pressure in my post, I am saying however his pressure was not responsible for 90% of that goal, if you think that then watch him pressure defenders in future and also observe how often the ball is cleared.
Despite crediting Rooney for his pressure numerous times now you still don't seem satisfied...
rpitroda said:Anyway, we are debating intricacies of "how much" Rooney was responsible. The fact he was was my main point, anyway. Your initial post seemed to make it sound like it wasn't totally insignificant but largely insignificant which is what I disagreed with.
As for the rest of your post about relying on his pressure to score goals and God help us if so, it has no relevance to what I'm saying. Don't even know where that fit in.
You must put a post into context, when the post to which I am replying says '90% responsible' and then I say I disagree then it probably means I disagree with the very statement in that post, I did not mention how responsible he was, I made clear his pressure made it a forced error but I still maintained it was an error by the defender.
You assumed I mean't largely insignificant but that's not my problem, I didn't say that, it's yours for assuming. And also the fact I referred to it as a forced error due to Rooney's pressure makes it quite clear I didn't think his role was largely insignificant, I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion.