- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,377
Should we get De Jong and Vitinha, how do you think both would be used. I don't think it would be wise using both of them in the double pivot, might also be that Bruno is being moved from midfield. Overall the signings suggest we are definitely aiming at controllong possession more.Just a little but not too much. Save some excitement for the signings we make during in July aswell.
This guy is very reliable,he never talk shit.
You think he could play with De Jong in a double pivot with Bruno at 10?I’d love a player like him with De Jong in a midfield 3, with a strong and physical midfielder in between them.
Think this is clearly a De Jong backup. They literally play the same way (judging on the 10 minute YouTube video I just watched).
You think he could play with De Jong in a double pivot with Bruno at 10?
“ClEaRlY a bAcKuP”
I hope its true that we're signing both Vitinha and de Jong. And I can see both fitting in to a ten Hag approach where the aim is to exert zonal and positional control, especially in possession.Should we get De Jong and Vitinha, how do you think both would be used. I don't think it would be wise using both of them in the double pivot, might also be that Bruno is being moved from midfield. Overall the signings suggest we are definitely aiming at controllong possession more.
I’d love a player like him with De Jong in a midfield 3, with a strong and physical midfielder in between them.
Where does Vitinha play in that 4231 and where is Bruno?I hope its true that we're signing both Vitinha and de Jong. And I can see both fitting in to a ten Hag approach where the aim is to exert zonal and positional control, especially in possession.
We have Fred to partner de Jong or if the club have the means, then go out there and sign a positionally disciplined midfielder to complete the midfield.
I think they'd fit into a 4231 quite comfortably.
where do you play Bruno with that set up?
Good to have competition for places imo. Bruno doesn't have to have a guaranteed place. We can sometimes play a midfield three as well.where do you play Bruno with that set up?
Bruno can be wide where his turnovers do less damage.Where does Vitinha play in that 4231 and where is Bruno?
Bruno would have to be moved then and I fully support that.I hope its true that we're signing both Vitinha and de Jong. And I can see both fitting in to a ten Hag approach where the aim is to exert zonal and positional control, especially in possession.
We have Fred to partner de Jong or if the club have the means, then go out there and sign a positionally disciplined midfielder to complete the midfield.
I think they'd fit into a 4231 quite comfortably.
Next to Van de Beek.
Next to Van de Beek.
For me Bruno doesn't fit anywhere, the way he gives the ball away. But if we do sign Vitinha along with de Jong, then I can see ten Hag trying Bruno in a false #9 role, which would suit the team dynamic. And contrary to what some have said, the false #9 position would help Bruno to be more disciplined, and it's a simple role that requires one to repeatedly start high and go towards the ball in deeper areas which can cause a dilemma for the opposition CBs.Where does Vitinha play in that 4231 and where is Bruno?
Think this is clearly a De Jong backup. They literally play the same way (judging on the 10 minute YouTube video I just watched).
He's of the Moutinho/Thiago mould isn't he?
Technically brilliant, tenacious on and off the ball.
Because they know better than us forum dwellersI don't get this, people are saying his playing style is similar to de jong so shouldn't he be a back up in case that falls through?
Why are we going for both according the reports?
Bruno can be wide where his turnovers do less damage.
I follow/support Celtics in the NBA, and watched game 5 of the NBA finals today, so the term "turnover" triggers me
I hope Bruno either improves and doesn't giveaway possession carelessly next season or he is deployed in a false 9 or a wide role, not in CM/CAM role.