Mourinho:
Can't say I've noticed him being a particularly egregious diver.
Drogba dived plenty too, in ridiculously theatrical ways, so it’s a particularly odd comparison…
I'd forgotten about that side of Drogba.
There's some big names on that list!Who is Jose trying to kid?
Drogba was such a diver, he's named on the list of most prominent divers in world football on the wikipedia page about diving.
Rashford and Osimhen in the same XI would be a nightmare for oppositions.
Drogba dived plenty too, in ridiculously theatrical ways, so it’s a particularly odd comparison…
Drogba would go from being able to hold off two centrebacks with ease whilst considering what he’ll do with the ball to being as a light a feather on whim. Easy to forget!
Osimhen is currently on 110k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will get 200k p.w (10.4m per year). Assume his transfer fees is 100m (20m per year for 5 years), we are paying 30.4m per year on the deal.
On contrary, Kane is currently on 200 k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will demand Sancho's or Salah 350k p.w (18.2 per year). Especially considering he's at 30 years old, it makes sense to ask such a huge salary. Assume his transfer fees is 75m (15m per year for 5 years), we are paying 33.2m per year on the deal.
30.4m vs 33.2m. This brings into conclusion that Osimhen is still cheaper deal than Kane despite of the huge transfer fees. The Osimhen one provides more value than Kane.
Osimhen is currently on 110k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will get 200k p.w (10.4m per year). Assume his transfer fees is 100m (20m per year for 5 years), we are paying 30.4m per year on the deal.
On contrary, Kane is currently on 200 k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will demand Sancho's or Salah 350k p.w (18.2 per year). Especially considering he's at 30 years old, it makes sense to ask such a huge salary. Assume his transfer fees is 75m (15m per year for 5 years), we are paying 33.2m per year on the deal.
30.4m vs 33.2m. This brings into conclusion that Osimhen is still cheaper deal than Kane despite of the huge transfer fees. The Osimhen one provides more value than Kane.
If you think Levy's a tough negotiator, wait till you see ADL. He's not letting Osimhen go for 100M.
those Osimhen figures might be a tad optimistic, I think it'll be 130m+ this summer and he'll likely want 300k pw
if we get taken over though I doubt it will matter much.. ETH will get a striker and if he wants Omishen the money will be there
The report mentions 120m euro which equivalent to 100m pounds. That's where I get the valuation from. The guy is only has 2 years contract after all.
May be I have this weird thinking about I always thought lot of these ''young'' foreigner players especially outside Europe don't often demand crazy salary when they move to bigger club (not disrespecting Napoli here) because their focus at early age is about playing in top top level. Lisandro Martinez (120k), Nunez (140k), Luis Diaz (56k) and etc. Even Mane and Salah when signed for Liverpool were under 200k initially.
140m for player on 2 years contract left is madness.Looks very good, his heading ability looks exactly like what players like Anthony needs with his crossing whilst Osihmen’s runs in behind seems like what Sancho may need with his through balls.
He will press all over the place as well. His heat map looks crazy.
However, he isnt going for anything less than 140 million, especially if he ends the league with 20 goals.
It’s the only reason why Kane seems a bit more achievable- if he puts a bit of pressure then the max Spurs would get is 60 mil due to a lack of interest from others.
I’m not sure how Osihmen will link up with Rashford too. Maybe his link up play is not bad and he would get better? Hope so, because that’s the only thing Kane would bring to United - making Rashford in to the legendary version of Son, Anthony a much better version of Kulusevski, and Sancho the ultimate version of Lucas.
140m for player on 2 years contract left is madness.
I don't think Levy will sell Kane for 60m to the PL team either. If anything, Levy is also madness.I don’t think Napoli are exactly sane either.
No chance, Napoli are in the middle of a title charge and he's indispensable for that. Him and KvaratskheliaCheeky loan bid?
No chance, Napoli are in the middle of a title charge and he's indispensable for that. Him and Kvaratskhelia
Victor is like the complete opposite of weghorst. He runs in behind, is a fantastic finisher and presses well too...however his link up play and hold up isnt so good. Weghorst excels in the link up play and hold up...but cant run in behind. Either way, its better to ger victor over harry kane
That's why if we could get Weghorst for around £10m-£15m then got two different types of number 9 which is useful
Can we at least wait and see if Weghorst is anywhere close to good enough before making these plans? I think that is hugely debatable at this point.
Chelsea need a striker in the summer.
Yeah they will be a danger for him no doubt
Doubt they will be spending much in the summer tbh, FFP going to be thumbing their ass good and getting a good feel inside to see what is going on
Assuming he wants him that isSigning him is drop in the ocean if we get owners who are willing to back Erik to the hilt
Assuming he wants him that is