Adam-Utd
Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 39,954
look at his goal tonight, you can’t do that with poor technique.Will his technique be good enough for Utd,can anyone confirm if that is an issue at all
look at his goal tonight, you can’t do that with poor technique.Will his technique be good enough for Utd,can anyone confirm if that is an issue at all
The time and space you get on the ball in Serie A compared to Premier League is night and day. There is definitely potential in the guy but I think he'd struggle in the PL where you do not get remotely get that much time and space on the ball and everything is faster, tighter and more pressure on you.
The price mentioned for him is also insane and I think it takes us out of the equation.
To be fair, if he wins Serie A, he’s pretty much will have more winning trophy experienced than Kane.
I haven’t watch him yet but based on the youtube videos, his ‘’outside the box‘’ game play reminds me of Welbeck. Welbeck has poor finishing ability but this guy has top class finishing ability. Some of the goals he scored are from difficult angle yet he managed to score them the one that I still remember was the goal vs Smalling. I think he can play in PL.
The time and space you get on the ball in Serie A compared to Premier League is night and day. There is definitely potential in the guy but I think he'd struggle in the PL where you do not get remotely get that much time and space on the ball and everything is faster, tighter and more pressure on you.
The price mentioned for him is also insane and I think it takes us out of the equation.
Well, the last part of my post could change if we head into the summer under new ownership depending on who that would be. We can almost guarantee Chelsea will be in for him.So what would you do
He's on the same level as Drogba, but Didier wouldn't [dive]... If Victor changes, then that's fine. If I were at a club with a lot of money, I'd sign him. However, if one day he goes to England, has to change, because in Italy they still accept this type of behavior, but in England they would be tough with him. I told him he scored a great goal and he has to stop throwing himself into the pool. His goal was fantastic, he did the same thing the other time we met, so he's a fantastic player. But he has to stop to dive.
Mourinho:
Can't say I've noticed him being a particularly egregious diver.
Drogba dived plenty too, in ridiculously theatrical ways, so it’s a particularly odd comparison…
I'd forgotten about that side of Drogba.
There's some big names on that list!Who is Jose trying to kid?
Drogba was such a diver, he's named on the list of most prominent divers in world football on the wikipedia page about diving.
Rashford and Osimhen in the same XI would be a nightmare for oppositions.
Drogba dived plenty too, in ridiculously theatrical ways, so it’s a particularly odd comparison…
Drogba would go from being able to hold off two centrebacks with ease whilst considering what he’ll do with the ball to being as a light a feather on whim. Easy to forget!
Osimhen is currently on 110k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will get 200k p.w (10.4m per year). Assume his transfer fees is 100m (20m per year for 5 years), we are paying 30.4m per year on the deal.
On contrary, Kane is currently on 200 k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will demand Sancho's or Salah 350k p.w (18.2 per year). Especially considering he's at 30 years old, it makes sense to ask such a huge salary. Assume his transfer fees is 75m (15m per year for 5 years), we are paying 33.2m per year on the deal.
30.4m vs 33.2m. This brings into conclusion that Osimhen is still cheaper deal than Kane despite of the huge transfer fees. The Osimhen one provides more value than Kane.
Osimhen is currently on 110k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will get 200k p.w (10.4m per year). Assume his transfer fees is 100m (20m per year for 5 years), we are paying 30.4m per year on the deal.
On contrary, Kane is currently on 200 k p.w. I'm assuming if he comes here, he will demand Sancho's or Salah 350k p.w (18.2 per year). Especially considering he's at 30 years old, it makes sense to ask such a huge salary. Assume his transfer fees is 75m (15m per year for 5 years), we are paying 33.2m per year on the deal.
30.4m vs 33.2m. This brings into conclusion that Osimhen is still cheaper deal than Kane despite of the huge transfer fees. The Osimhen one provides more value than Kane.
If you think Levy's a tough negotiator, wait till you see ADL. He's not letting Osimhen go for 100M.
those Osimhen figures might be a tad optimistic, I think it'll be 130m+ this summer and he'll likely want 300k pw
if we get taken over though I doubt it will matter much.. ETH will get a striker and if he wants Omishen the money will be there
The report mentions 120m euro which equivalent to 100m pounds. That's where I get the valuation from. The guy is only has 2 years contract after all.
May be I have this weird thinking about I always thought lot of these ''young'' foreigner players especially outside Europe don't often demand crazy salary when they move to bigger club (not disrespecting Napoli here) because their focus at early age is about playing in top top level. Lisandro Martinez (120k), Nunez (140k), Luis Diaz (56k) and etc. Even Mane and Salah when signed for Liverpool were under 200k initially.
140m for player on 2 years contract left is madness.Looks very good, his heading ability looks exactly like what players like Anthony needs with his crossing whilst Osihmen’s runs in behind seems like what Sancho may need with his through balls.
He will press all over the place as well. His heat map looks crazy.
However, he isnt going for anything less than 140 million, especially if he ends the league with 20 goals.
It’s the only reason why Kane seems a bit more achievable- if he puts a bit of pressure then the max Spurs would get is 60 mil due to a lack of interest from others.
I’m not sure how Osihmen will link up with Rashford too. Maybe his link up play is not bad and he would get better? Hope so, because that’s the only thing Kane would bring to United - making Rashford in to the legendary version of Son, Anthony a much better version of Kulusevski, and Sancho the ultimate version of Lucas.
140m for player on 2 years contract left is madness.
I don't think Levy will sell Kane for 60m to the PL team either. If anything, Levy is also madness.I don’t think Napoli are exactly sane either.
No chance, Napoli are in the middle of a title charge and he's indispensable for that. Him and KvaratskheliaCheeky loan bid?
No chance, Napoli are in the middle of a title charge and he's indispensable for that. Him and Kvaratskhelia