Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 12,425
Joao Felix cost 126M after a single season of senior football in Portugal at 19You can probably add the Nunez fee to the mix as well.
Joao Felix cost 126M after a single season of senior football in Portugal at 19You can probably add the Nunez fee to the mix as well.
It's not unfortunately, this deal seems to have been an outlier for what's going to happen this summer. Last summer it was that French lad who went to Madrid for £80m and we all remember the impact Neymar had on the market. Expect daft prices this summer as well, these kinds of deals tell everyone there's more money in the market than people are letting on.I hate journalists. How can anyone possibly have had it said or inferred to them that an executive at Napoli has said "well look at what mudryk just went for". It's all made up speculative bullshit.
We do have a compatriot we can call on to put a good word in
Pretty sure Chelsea will be after him the minute we make our bid and happy to spend whatever Napoli will be asking for, so unless we get new owners in before Summer I don't see this happening at all. Osimhen seems exactly like the type of signing our new owners would make as their statement though it's hard to imagine we will be taken over by someone insane enough to outbid Chelsea.
Won’t matter if they offer more to Napoli and we aren’t willing to match.
I think he’ll be the flagship name we sign under the new owners. If Ten Hag thinks he’s perfect for our side then go get him
I dunno, we said Martinez was too much, Casemiro not worth for his age etc but we went after his first choices and got them done. Even FDJ would have been done if he wanted to leave.I don't see us spending 150m Euros(133m pounds) and also bringing other positions(GK, CM etc)
It will be more Sensible to bring cheaper option like Goncalo Ramos and other positions
'Sensible' and 'cheaper' being mentioned in regards to a Benfica playerI don't see us spending 150m Euros(133m pounds) and also bringing other positions(GK, CM etc)
It will be more Sensible to bring cheaper option like Goncalo Ramos and other positions
'Sensible' and 'cheaper' being mentioned in regards to a Benfica player
They're being very sensible about Enzo Fernandez's valuation as well...Look how sensible they sold Nunez to Liverpool.
Man Utd is Arguably the most supported club in Nigeria with Chelsea and Arsenal.Wasn't it reported that one of the reasons Oshimen chose Napoli over us was because he didn't want to compete with Igalo?
We were one of the favorites to get him when he left Lille:
https://www.sportsmole.co.uk/footba...cks-napoli-over-manchester-united_406522.html
Seems like United is really big in Nigeria, despite us really never having any Nigerian players? Besides Igalo and some youngsters, Shola?, I can't think of any Nigerian players that have played for us.
I think he’ll be the flagship name we sign under the new owners. If Ten Hag thinks he’s perfect for our side then go get him
The only good argument I've read (in the recent Athletic article about United's recruitment) is so that you can agree a price with a club so that the club doesn't add a United tax. However, it would obviously defeat the purpose of doing that if you're going to leak to the papers that you are the club doing so.Why do we need a lot of intermediaries?
Prefer Sesko
I think Osimhen will probably cost more than Kane. Quite considerably more.Osimhen would probably cost the same amount as Kane but he's a hell of a lot younger and probably easier to get here than Kane
I think Osimhen will probably cost more than Kane. Quite considerably more.
Based on potential costs, all things even, probably Osimhen.Even over Osimhen?
Once the new owners in, we should be targeting Mbappe, forget about the rest of them.
Oh absolutely. The long-term payoff from Osimhen or Sesko has the potential to be quite a bit higher than with Kane. In the short-term, though, Kane is probably the closest thing you could get to a sure-bet.Indeed.
Though players like Sesko and Osimhen will also hold their value better than Kane will too due to their age, so that factors into the price.
Is he really 24? Or as David Moyes once said is he a nigerian 24? (Accusation thats been levelled at a few players from continents of africa and south america for doctoring their actual age: Yakubu, Obfemi Martins, Falcao etc).Osimhen would probably cost the same amount as Kane but he's a hell of a lot younger and probably easier to get here than Kane
I think Osimhen will probably cost more than Kane. Quite considerably more.
Is he really 24? Or as David Moyes once said is he a nigerian 24? (Accusation thats been levelled at a few players from continents of africa and south america for doctoring their actual age: Yakubu, Obfemi Martins, Falcao etc).
I'm not sure, I think you're probably looking at a fair bit more than 110 million for Osimhen...guessing his cost will be 110m plus addons....Kane to stay in the PL is going to cost 85m-100m which isn't that much less
haha....that certainly is a question and no one really knows if it is a legit age or not but he clearly fits the profile of what ETH wants in a number 9
Prefer sesko to Kane? Come on lad.Prefer Sesko
I'm not sure, I think you're probably looking at a fair bit more than 110 million for Osimhen...
A fair bit more that 110 million?? What sort of nonsense is that?I'm not sure, I think you're probably looking at a fair bit more than 110 million for Osimhen...