Kostov
Full Member
Good game again, calm and composed. Game after game his confidence is building up and it's showing.
I never said Opta rating systems. I said Opta based rating systems.Opta don’t generate the scores. Whoscored buy the raw data from Opta for their website and give the scores from their criteria. The stats from that game say he had 9 key passes too, which is a really really high amount. How good the quality of chances he created, that I don’t know as I can’t find an individual highlights for him.
I never said Opta rating systems. I said Opta based rating systems.
De Bruyne did a 6-7 performance.
Key passes is a useless metric in this case since De Bruyne takes most set pieces for Man City.
Everybody's biggest test is this weekend.His biggest test is this weekend.
I see, you mean that his nine in this case needs to be taken with a grain of salt? Is that what you are saying?Most clubs have a player that takes all set pieces. He would only get a key pass from a set piece if it resulted in an attempt on goal. The quality of chance created is the only grey area here.
I see, you mean that his nine in this case needs to be taken with a grain of salt? Is that what you are saying?
That is what I mean by context. Regarding the position debate, you would compare goalkeepers against goalkeepers etc, there is little point in comparing a CF with a GK in any football debate.
Whoscored's model is attacker-centric but perhaps that is logical given that attacking players are the most highly valued in football.
I'm not sure that 'common sense' and 'football knowledge' does give you a better chance of interpretation, given the bias that people, especially partisan fan, are subject too.
Football clubs and all sports teams/athletes take statistics very seriously and invest in them accordingly. That is telling.
I think the point is exactly that. You are not sceptical because the stats are in line with the stats, while we who actually saw the match would not value him that high.If De Bruyne gets a high rating on there I’m not sceptical as he is one of the best players in the world this season. I can’t see any reason to be sceptical.
Don’t get me wrong; I put high value in statistics as that is invaluable to me in my work. However there is a lot of misuse. One of them is evaluating single players in single games as the large variation makes that useless. If you are interested in statistics you might be aware of Deming’s red bead experiment. Otherwise you should try to find it. That illustrates the danger in evaluating performance from statistics from a single event.
This model is far from bullet proof. I agree, De Bruyne might be the best player in PL, but is really Ashley Young top ten? He’s been great, but...? And I agree that it is very attacker-centric, which is one of the biggest flaws. I think that is because you only measure things that you can measure fairly objectively, and goals, passes etc are simple to measure. It is more difficult to measure movements on the pitch and leadership quality.
I think the point is exactly that. You are not sceptical because the stats are in line with the stats, while we who actually saw the match would not value him that high.
Anyways, great to see another solid performance from Lindelöf tonight.
‘Lindelof was the only one that I didn’t work with [before].
‘But in Portugal I control. I control inside information. ‘I know the qualities of the people, I know many things about social life, about private life, I know because even without working for that, the informations are arriving.’
Play him and drop Smalling. I don't care if he loses headers, he can build from the back and we desperately need that.