DavidDeSchmikes
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 18,724
the English refs are the ones operating the VARYeah, it's VAR fault that the Ingurlish refs are incompetent fecks.
the English refs are the ones operating the VARYeah, it's VAR fault that the Ingurlish refs are incompetent fecks.
the English refs are the ones operating the VAR
Yeah, the PL fecked up version is wank.Why blame VAR as a concept when other iterations of it have avoided being this stupid? In other leagues a dive like would that would at least have warranted a second look, which would be VAR working perfectly. The issue is the stupidity of those who were tasked with designing the version of VAR used in the PL, who have come up with a worse version than every other league.
If the Liverpool penalty isn’t pointed out as a clear and obvious error, then there is clearly something wrong with the referees, implementation of VAR and the old boys club of referees looking after each other.
Mane Dived way after he was ‘allegedly’ touched. The way he went over was like he’d had his legs taken away from under him.
This cheating could and should be stopped, especially now they have someone watching replays.
It is literally a disgrace right now.
Even if it was a foul, does Mane's subsequent dive not at least warrant the referee having another look?
In relation to this particular thread, it is just another in a string of examples of a refusal to overturn or even have the referee reconsider subjective on-pitch decisions.
Agree, I've hated it from the start, pointless they way it's being used.Honestly think VAR could disappear from the PL tomorrow and no one would notice or care, it's been so badly handled, and only managed to make the officials in this country look even more useless.
Fair comment but where that falls is the players who have been booked for simulation, and on replay have clearly been caught, it's a double standard. There VAR is not being used as it was supposedly brought in to do, guarantee fair play ! Those yellows mount up to a suspension, where they should be recinded but under the stupid rules it cannot! Bin VAR now, more mistakes now than ever.I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure a dive is the simulation of contact, meaning there was no contact. Embellishing contact can't be considered a dive. Albrighton made a wreckless, unneeded challenge, then Mane made a meal of it causing the ref to award a pen. VAR can't overturn that and frankly shouldn't.
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure a dive is the simulation of contact, meaning there was no contact. Embellishing contact can't be considered a dive. Albrighton made a wreckless, unneeded challenge, then Mane made a meal of it causing the ref to award a pen. VAR can't overturn that and frankly shouldn't.
If a player is booked for simulation and there is contact, that is a terrible call. You can't police embellishing contact in any sport. The best thing you can do is not make a call. Your definition of fair play seems subjective.Fair comment but where that falls is the players who have been booked for simulation, and on replay have clearly been caught, it's a double standard. There VAR is not being used as it was supposedly brought in to do, guarantee fair play ! Those yellows mount up to a suspension, where they should be recinded but under the stupid rules it cannot! Bin VAR now, more mistakes now than ever.
I agree it should be consistent but the point is VAR was never designed to redo subjective decisions (fouls, yellows, embellishing contact). It was designed to fix obvious errors (offsides, violent conduct not seen by ref, handballs, etc). VAR is not perfect but I think expectations of it change based on who is playing. In this case, if the decision went against Liverpool nobody would be this upset.the problem is in the consistency. With just the referee you can put it down to human mistakes. But with technology, you have to get more consistency. If the VAR didn’t overturn this one, then they should have intervened in martial vs palace or rodeo vs city, where the contact was way more clear than this instant.
the latter instances were not even accepted as mistakes by the ref in their report.
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure a dive is the simulation of contact, meaning there was no contact. Embellishing contact can't be considered a dive. Albrighton made a wreckless, unneeded challenge, then Mane made a meal of it causing the ref to award a pen. VAR can't overturn that and frankly shouldn't.
Yeah, it's VAR fault that the Ingurlish refs are incompetent fecks.
Hilarious. In fecking stitches here.Wouldn't it be funny if Rashford or Air Marshall Young get a slight contact in the area at 0-0. Fall down like a ton of bricks and ref doesn't award the penalty. VAR then views it and says no clear and obvious error. Only for Utd fans to scream blue murder?
Don't quit your day job.Wouldn't it be funny if Rashford or Air Marshall Young get a slight contact in the area at 0-0. Fall down like a ton of bricks and ref doesn't award the penalty. VAR then views it and says no clear and obvious error. Only for Utd fans to scream blue murder?
Simulation is the attempt to deceive the referee. This includes feigning injury or pretending to have been fouled. There is no mention anywhere in the laws that simulation is only for instance with no contact. Embellishing contact is still simulation.I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure a dive is the simulation of contact, meaning there was no contact. Embellishing contact can't be considered a dive. Albrighton made a wreckless, unneeded challenge, then Mane made a meal of it causing the ref to award a pen. VAR can't overturn that and frankly shouldn't.
But he was fouled and the contact wasn't slight, he just made a meal of it. Now if Mane drags purposely drags his legs over a defender not making a challenge that is a different scenario. When I say embellishing contact, I mean embellishing contact initiated by the defender and that can never be simulation in any sport (the NBA has good examples of this).Simulation is the attempt to deceive the referee. This includes feigning injury or pretending to have been fouled. There is no mention anywhere in the laws that simulation is only for instance with no contact. Embellishing contact is still simulation.
Of course VAR can overturn it. If they think it isn't a penalty then it'll be overruled. Slight contact isn't a foul, so slight contact doesn't mean VAR can't overrule it. How would that make any sense? VAR weren't going to overrule it because the PL VAR never overrule anything other than for offside and because it arguably was a penalty, even though Mane went down like an idiot. Of course they could have though.
You have to have one to be able to do that.Don't quit your day job.
Wouldn't it be funny if Rashford or Air Marshall Young get a slight contact in the area at 0-0. Fall down like a ton of bricks and ref doesn't award the penalty. VAR then views it and says no clear and obvious error. Only for Utd fans to scream blue murder?
Yeah but, what if, what if, that thing that happened in Uniteds favour years ago was still brought up scousers in a ridiculous attempt at justifying 2 seasons of blatantly crap decisions in Liverpool's favour?
Let's not forget Valencia being half an inch offside 5 minutes before Zlatan scored.
MONUMENTAL!
Wouldn't it be funny if you lot spent 30 years claiming the FA are corrupt only to finally win the league through absolute Bollox.
Imagine that....
Fair enough.I'd snap your hand off.
Nope. Only the ref can overturn itOf course VAR can overturn it.
VAR is a complete waste of time . Well the English version is anyhow . The clear and obvious rule is ruining the game imo. VAR hardly ever over turns a refs decision because like 99.9% of them you could probably argue a slight chance the original decision is right or wrong .
Honestly think VAR could disappear from the PL tomorrow and no one would notice or care, it's been so badly handled, and only managed to make the officials in this country look even more useless.
The leagues in which VAR basically re-refs the games are absolutely worse.
In South America, where this is the case, you see VAR intervening at all times, with the last Libertadores game having 20 minutes of it being stopped by VAR.
I understand though, its a lost cause for me. 95% of fans want more VAR, I really really don't understand it.
I think EPL knows they have a gem in their hands, they don't want the crazy frenetic pace of the games to be interrupted by VAR all the time. They are spot on.
But again, I understand I am against the grain here. Most people disagree with me. If EPL turns into the shit show that is in Serie A, south america etc I honestly consider stop watching football. Its that bad.
Referees aka "fecking clowns" are given way too much power IMHO.Nope. Only the ref can overturn it
The decision against anybody is the issues no matter who it is, it's not being used correctly if it's still open to suggestions or differing opinions from different VAR officials it's not working! There were so called grey areas before there are more now. Grealish for Villa perfect goal, VAR disallowed it through poor Refereenig wrong, hand balls in boxes it's different when goal is scored to not , wrong all these are grey areas , if so just bin it and go back to the human mistakes everyone is used to.If a player is booked for simulation and there is contact, that is a terrible call. You can't police embellishing contact in any sport. The best thing you can do is not make a call. Your definition of fair play seems subjective.
I agree it should be consistent but the point is VAR was never designed to redo subjective decisions (fouls, yellows, embellishing contact). It was designed to fix obvious errors (offsides, violent conduct not seen by ref, handballs, etc). VAR is not perfect but I think expectations of it change based on who is playing. In this case, if the decision went against Liverpool nobody would be this upset.
Agree, and it's got progressively worse since they all become Proffesional officials, these guys make a very very good living at this, they haven't got day jobs like before, there is a serious need to look at this, and they need to look at other sports to find the answer.There’s two things the game is absolutely desperate for, even more so with VAR, and that’s transparency and accountability.
Firstly, decisions need clear explanation from the officials that made them. In a lot of cases it could educate the layman to the nuances of the rules, in other cases it could establish a consensus on when decisions are right or wrong and if the rules maybe need changing.
With transparency comes accountability. If you’ve got referees constantly making decisions that they have no good explanation for then they need to be held accountable for them. It’s currently a closed society of professionals who look after their own. It’s no surprise the standard is getting so fecking bad, they have the written rules and then they have their own code that they apply to the game and it’s completely wrong.