So there's not going to be any more debates, at all? Is there anything else I can look forward to?
So there's not going to be any more debates, at all? Is there anything else I can look forward to?
Well that's what I meant by "And yes in some cases they surely buy some version of trickle-down" before going onto the others. I wasn't suggesting they were all fundies and bigots by any means, my point was that you can be poor, not much like low taxes for the rich, but still vote Republican for mainly cultural reasons.
Thanks for your thoughts brad.
I work with a bunch of very well educated republicans. The owners of the company and many of the heads of departments are all republicans. They all know I am a democrat but I love those guys. We get on like a house on fire. But I fundamentally disagree with them on economics. Almost all of them dislike the demonisation of the President. They also are embarrassed by the Tea party crazies.
I put down the main reason them being republicans to them being brought up as republicans. For me it was obvious I would lean to labour. I grew up loving the great music of the 60s..and that music was closely tied to the great events happening in America that went on to influence the whole world. Of course the main political names of that period were JFK, Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. I grew up admiring these great men.
For me there was never a doubt I would be a democrat the moment I came to the US.
Simply put, the main difference I see between the parties is, the Democratic party is more about ordinary people and being 'inclusive'. The GOP is not about either.
That is why my hope is the changing demographics will help pull the GOP to the middle...and reasonableness.
Convention should be great entertainment.
I see, sorry Plech. You're right.
Thanks for your thoughts brad.
I work with a bunch of very well educated republicans. The owners of the company and many of the heads of departments are all republicans. They all know I am a democrat but I love those guys. We get on like a house on fire. But I fundamentally disagree with them on economics. Almost all of them dislike the demonisation of the President. They also are embarrassed by the Tea party crazies.
I put down the main reason them being republicans to them being brought up as republicans. For me it was obvious I would lean to labour. I grew up loving the great music of the 60s..and that music was closely tied to the great events happening in America that went on to influence the whole world. Of course the main political names of that period were JFK, Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. I grew up admiring these great men.
For me there was never a doubt I would be a democrat the moment I came to the US.
Simply put, the main difference I see between the parties is, the Democratic party is more about ordinary people and being 'inclusive'. The GOP is not about either.
That is why my hope is the changing demographics will help pull the GOP to the middle...and reasonableness.
It's Santorum. He's berating Obama for being anti-war. What a douche Obama is for not having a hard-on for war. It doesn't have to make sense because Santorum doesn't.
Shouldn't be a surprise given that its his home state and where he was previously a Senator. Time is running out for him though. Most of the primaries from now are in areas of the country that favor Romney. The pressure is going to mount on him to get out for party solidarity either this month or in early May.
Pennsylvania has a huge split between town and country, rural attitudes are very conservative.
No worries!
My understanding, no doubt from a simplistic and European perspective, is that the basic ethos of the Republican party - not the current craziness but the fundamental world-view - is more in tune with the typical American attitude to life than the Democrats' is. It's optimistic, individualistic, patriotic, religious and validates freedom above all competing values (except national security).
The optimistic thing is an unusual fit with a conservative party - conservatives are normally very much aware of the precariousness of life, keen to batten down the hatches and avoid too much dangerous change and uncertainty. It's the left that's traditionally more optimistic, even utopian, more of a transformative movement. In that respect the GOP is more Thatcherite than traditionally conservative.
There's also a fundamental conflict between the individualist, libertarian aspects of US conservatism and its highly authoritarian tendencies, and a distrust of science that's not particularly typically conservative.
I think the more fairness-based, pro-government period in US politics, from the New Deal through the Great Society but also including Eisenhower who was a conservative but not a US-style conservative, was something of a blip.
"Romeny/Ryan 2012.
Because an Etch-A-Sketch requires TwoKnobs"
Rmoney*
Pennsylvania has a huge split between town and country, rural attitudes are very conservative.
fecks sake, Stewart sums up the enthusiasm for Romney so perfectly.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/m...suffrage-2012---jump-on-the-bandwagon-edition
fecks sake, Stewart sums up the enthusiasm for Romney so perfectly.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/m...suffrage-2012---jump-on-the-bandwagon-edition
Republican controlled legislatures and their laws on voter registration
Talk about making life difficult for minorities, especially in Florida
fecks sake, Stewart sums up the enthusiasm for Romney so perfectly.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/m...suffrage-2012---jump-on-the-bandwagon-edition
CNN Breaking News @cnnbrk Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum to suspend campaign, senior adviser says
Didn't see that coming...not just yet anyway