Sky1981
Fending off the urge
Wait... so ronaldo the culprit now?
Is there no bottom to this?
Is there no bottom to this?
I'd seriously doubt this.If Ronaldo is the problem you can let him go to City. In fact he is probably starting to regret not going there now.
He will absolutely tear things up there. Too bad the United connection makes it too hard for him to play there without taking a reputation hit.
We have to make our entire set up work to service Ronaldo. That might not be the prettiest football but he will win us every game we play if we get the ball to him in the box.
We currently have Greenwood, Sancho and Rashford as wingers who all like to cut inside and shoot, rather than stay wide and cross the ball.
Ole needs to get ruthless and sacrifice other players so we can get the most from having Ronaldo back. If other players suffer then so be it, United is more important than any individual. Ronaldo is our best route to winning games, making him thrive should be the priority - and Ole needs to stop trying to keep so many players happy, which isn't getting results and is jeopardising his job.
I'd seriously doubt this.
Pep never likes a pure poacher in his entire career. He probably hates pure strikers with a passion. Ibra, Eto, Villa, Henry, even Aguero to some extent. You name it. The only striker he's been happy with is Lewan who is much much more than a pure striker.
And Jesus has the best or second best pressing rate among the PL strikers. While Ronaldo has the worst. 2 against 18 or something.
Or he could get ruthless and move Ronaldo to an impact sub/rotational role, pick and choose his matches rather than being automatic starter and get back to our previous best proven route of winning games under Ole - by having a team focused on Bruno Fernandes.
I'd seriously doubt this.
Pep never likes a pure poacher in his entire career. He probably hates pure strikers with a passion. Ibra, Eto, Villa, Henry, even Aguero to some extent. You name it. The only striker he's been happy with is Lewan who is much much more than a pure striker.
And Jesus has the best or second best pressing rate among the PL strikers. While Ronaldo has the worst. 2 against 18 or something.
We have to make our entire set up work to service Ronaldo. That might not be the prettiest football but he will win us every game we play if we get the ball to him in the box.
We currently have Greenwood, Sancho and Rashford as wingers who all like to cut inside and shoot, rather than stay wide and cross the ball.
Ole needs to get ruthless and sacrifice other players so we can get the most from having Ronaldo back. If other players suffer then so be it, United is more important than any individual. Ronaldo is our best route to winning games, making him thrive should be the priority - and Ole needs to stop trying to keep so many players happy, which isn't getting results and is jeopardising his job.
I don't care how insanely good he is at scoring, it would be crazy to deliberately move potential 20+ goal scorers like Rashford and Greenwood further from the goal just to service Ronaldo, especially since both of them are better at scoring themselves than setting up other players.
Ronaldo now though is completely different to all the above, maybe Ibra is the only close comparison given their game now and Ibra was great under Pep (22 goals, 13 assists in 46 games) he just didn't like him and didn't want to be in a team where everything had to go through Messi. He'd be on penalties for City and they'd just be serving him balls on a plate for 90mins.I'd seriously doubt this.
Pep never likes a pure poacher in his entire career. He probably hates pure strikers with a passion. Ibra, Eto, Villa, Henry, even Aguero to some extent. You name it. The only striker he's been happy with is Lewan who is much much more than a pure striker.
And Jesus has the best or second best pressing rate among the PL strikers. While Ronaldo has the worst. 2 against 18 or something.
Ibra was great under Pep (22 goals, 13 assists in 46 games) he just didn't like him and didn't want to be in a team where everything had to go through Messi
Where there was that other part of his post where he said, "we'd win every game we played". Would it be worth it to you then?I don't care how insanely good he is at scoring, it would be crazy to deliberately move potential 20+ goal scorers like Rashford and Greenwood further from the goal just to service Ronaldo, especially since both of them are better at scoring themselves than setting up other players.
Yep agree on all. It's a sign of the times I guess that people are pointing fingers but this is one of those really simple things that every football fan can see so clearly: you have to play a certain way with Ronaldo as CF.I think Guardiola initially wanted to base his attack around Ibrahimovic's presence up front, but realized halfway through 09/10 that they'd be even better with Messi in the center and two wide forwards running in behind. Probably the right call in hindsight, 2010/11 was that team's peak once they settled on Messi flanked by Pedro and Villa (no idea what he's doing in that guy's list of pure strikers Guardiola hated or whatever, he adapted his game brilliantly to play along with Messi).
Completely agree with everything else. We've needed to get better at controlling games for ages anyway, which is how you go from high-60s / mid-70s points tallies to actually competing for the title. And when (if?) we do reach that level, Ronaldo is still one of the best players in the world to have on the end of chances,
The club winning is more important than individuals. They have to adapt or die - we've had plenty of players in the past who can adequately assist our strikers and still score a decent tally themselves.
Personally I think servicing Ronaldo is our best route to winning games at this time.
Where there was that other part of his post where he said, "we'd win every game we played". Would it be worth it to you then?
Atletico play Suarez most but not all the time and he’s their best goalscorer/a great of his generation, Simeone picks his games on the ones that suit him. That’s why the Ferguson video was frustrating, it puts pressure on Ole to play Ronaldo in every match, when he should be picked for certain games. In that way he could possibly be more effective and the team wouldn’t be trapped into forming itself in his image.
He would be a good impact sub though, can’t argue with that.The idea that we should use Ronaldo as an "impact sub" is an odd one.
Thats the same people who by their logic would want Bamford over Ronaldo because he "presses"Something something 36 year old primadonna who causes more problems than he solves.