Well yeah, but I'm not sure what your trying to say here. Do you think the way Madrid conduct transfers is a good way to run a club? It would drive us into the ground.
If we value Fellaini at £20million and they want £30million then I wouldn't begrudge Moyes for not paying more than what he feels is the right fee. Hes running a business not playing a computer game, at the end of the day he needs to be responsible and paying more than players are worth isn't that. It would be effectively criticising him for NOT agreeing a bad deal, which seems strange.
Like I said though the Fellaini thing is a bit of a joke because of his previous release clause. Should have been tied up months ago seeing as it was always going to come down to this.
We do not exist in isolation, we exist in a market. From all accounts, Everton are not asking for £30m, and we are also willing to go higher than £20m. Because of this, there cannot be more than a few million difference. This would not run us into the ground.
And no, I have no issues with Madrid's transfer policy. It involves them buying very good players for a lot of money, as opposed to ordinary players for a little bit of money. If they can afford it, that would be the logical way to go about having a very good team.
We are not even talking about City and Chelsea here. Teams like Real, Barca and Bayern (who we consider our equals in terms of standing) are not oil clubs, and generate similar figures to us. We, however, are tight gits, who believe in spending no more than £30m at most for a player.
I am convinced that if we were in Arsenal's position (yes, Arsenal!), we would have had talks with Madrid for weeks for Ozil, made a series of rejected bids and pissed them off, only for them to get fed up and accept an offer from PSG. We will then complain about these oil clubs and say that our club 'can't be blamed, he obviously chose PSG for the money'.