DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Think she should go, after the election.
That's 2 now, bet she's looking forward to the debates.
I do wonder if they'll bring Lucas in for at least one now, as they should have from the off.Dear me, forgot about the debates. No wonder Cameron wanted her on.
Just listened to it now. My god she was rubbish. The interviewer was good but not brutal- the late coughing was funny. Despite their shambles, 12.4% of the Caf are still going to vote for them according to the poll above. Maybe it's the same types who voted for Boris because they find him amusing in a buffoonish way.Shit she was worse. Just fecked the Greens up the arse. No one can vote for a klutz.
I wasn't one of the above Green voters, but would still happily vote for them so as to improve their standing in parliament. Having a shit leader doesn't really have any impact on that.Just listened to it now. My god she was rubbish. The interviewer was good but not brutal- the late coughing was funny. Despite their shambles, 12.4% of the Caf are still going to vote for them according to the poll above. Maybe it's the same types who voted for Boris because they find him amusing in a buffoonish way.
That's kind of missing the point of the Greens. The alternative is downright immorral, so you vote Green, knowing they will not gain power but that your vote denotes a desire for a more socially responsible society. This then encourages the Labour party to move more towards the Greens and the Tories to move towards where Labour were.That is horrible to listen to. Not the first time either. I considered voting for them, but with a leader like Bennett, not a bloody chance. I think they have some good ideas but some of the stuff they suggest is downright silly and not thought through.
That's kind of missing the point of the Greens. The alternative is downright immorral, so you vote Green, knowing they will not gain power but that your vote denotes a desire for a more socially responsible society. This then encourages the Labour party to move more towards the Greens and the Tories to move towards where Labour were.
Then the Tories get in again.That's kind of missing the point of the Greens. The alternative is downright immorral, so you vote Green, knowing they will not gain power but that your vote denotes a desire for a more socially responsible society. This then encourages the Labour party to move more towards the Greens and the Tories to move towards where Labour were.
Yup. Not everyone has the stomach to vote the lesser evil, though.Then the Tories get in again.
That's fair but a £3000 cut isn't going to change that.I think that the system definitely needed looking at given that figures were showing a huge amount of the loans were never going to be repaid - allowing that to continue could result in a really punitive system being introduced in future to "restore the balance". Concerned though that some who've analysed the proposals suggest that those who benefit most out of a cut would be the highest earners. I don't think it's purely to counter the Greens either, something like this has been rumoured to be coming for years from Labour.
They are pandering because the whole tuition fee's scandal has probably ended the Lib Dems as an effective force for this general election, I guess its not very wise to cross students.Disappointed Labour is wanting to cut tuition fees. I'm someone who'll probably wind up paying them in a few years but using a nice loan that I don't have to start paying back until I start earning a good amount. There are better things to do with whatever money you can get out of rich old people. Is just pandering to students, lest they vote Green.
The cut itself doesn't no, but the increase of revenue they say they're generating elsewhere to pick up the slack does - it's bringing money in to "fund" a cut in income that wouldn't have come in anyway. I don't think it's a policy that's generally going to make a great deal of difference politically though of itself, the most important thing to my mind is that students from disadvantaged backgrounds aren't being put off, and in fairness they don't seem to be at the moment.That's fair but a £3000 cut isn't going to change that.
Just listened to it now. My god she was rubbish. The interviewer was good but not brutal- the late coughing was funny. Despite their shambles, 12.4% of the Caf are still going to vote for them according to the poll above. Maybe it's the same types who voted for Boris because they find him amusing in a buffoonish way.
Who am I supposed to vote for instead then? Good Ol' Davey? Its a protest, nothing like voting for a party with a very good chance of winning regardless of policies because the leader is funny.
Do you know much about the Scots Greens? I remember hearing they had a considerable membership boost, post-referendum, but haven't heard a thing about them since.That's true, to be fair, despite how awful she is. There's an argument as well that them getting more votes will lead to them trying to become more of a serious party with less questionable policies if people are actually willing to vote for them.
Do you know much about the Scots Greens? I remember hearing they had a considerable membership boost, post-referendum, but haven't heard a thing about them since.
Meh. Soundbite politics. Much easier to agree with something really specific that you like than something broadbrush, even though the broader policies are the ones that have the greater impact.