Plugsy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 6,584
I said you were right what can i do more !!!
I have ironing
I said you were right what can i do more !!!
I'm neither drunk nor tired. I just don't see why it's beyond the wit of man to consider that we can make more than one signing. I just suggested maybe we do need to look at signing a striker. Suddenly that meant we can't sign a CM or I'm tired or drunk?
I seriously don't see why we need one when we're not in Europe, Wellbeck stepped up whilst RVP and Rooney was injured last season and I don't see why he wouldn't again, then we also have young Wilson coming through the ranks.
We have a very good set of Strikers as it is already for what we have coming up next season I feel.
New day new rumour
United now say neither Kroos nor Fábregas are no longer in their thinking any longer.
Here mister, is your name really Jaysus Ronaldo?Jesus Ronaldo. Who is that?
As much as we need him, I really don't wanna see Pogba back here. It still hurts, and spunking £60 million to get him back would feel wrong. That's an absurd amount of money.
2 tweets in the last 3 pages, one of them by Agent Maru
It's a discussion thread, what is your point?
Yeah, a discussion thread for tweets (preferably from semi reliable sources).
In the last 3 pages most posts have been discussing the Guardian's Pogba tweet, The Mail's Bayern trio tweet or rightfully mocking that ridiculous Ronaldo tweet. I don't see the problem.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/tweets-only.328302/unreadI don't know about anyone else but I just follow this thread for tweets. It would be nice to have at least a couple of tweets per page.
I don't get the point in that thread. The tweets will end up in this thread anyway.
The point is, whoever posts a tweet, needs to do in both the threads. That way, people who are only interested in tweets can go to that thread and read everything at once rather than going through pages in this for a couple of tweets. But it may be too much work.
I don't get the point in that thread. The tweets will end up in this thread anyway.
It doesn't take long to scroll through a page and stop when you see something embedded. Posting in both threads is tedious and makes no sense if some of the tweets aren't exactly earth shattering.
It doesn't take long to scroll through a page and stop when you see something embedded. Posting in both threads is tedious and makes no sense if some of the tweets aren't exactly earth shattering.
So it doesn't take long to search through 3 pages of discussion to find 3 tweets but taking an extra 15 seconds to post the tweet in both threads is "tedious". Superb logic.
100 million would get a Fabregas-Schweinsteiger midfield and Hummels too. It wouldn't be very good idea to splash all of that on Pogba and Barkley.Pogba and Barkley - now that would be a midfield that will dominate the P.L for the next 10 years. That is what we should use £100 million on.
I'd choose Verratti or Kovacic over Barkley.Pogba and Barkley - now that would be a midfield that will dominate the P.L for the next 10 years. That is what we should use £100 million on.
Pogba and Barkley - now that would be a midfield that will dominate the P.L for the next 10 years. That is what we should use £100 million on.
I'd choose Verratti or Kovacic over Barkley.
Barkley could be an absolute superstar in the future - one of those players you build a side around. Has all the tools - pace, power and an eye for goal.
Long term he's going to be a number 10 though, rather than a central midfielder.
Woodward and Van Gaal doesn't seem to have a clue on who their signing. Both are targeting unrealeastic targets such as Hummels, Cesc, Vidal etc, what about Carvalho, Witsel, Kovacic, Mangala and Rodriguez from Wolfsburg, those guys are realistic and would massively improve us.
100 million would get a Fabregas-Schweinsteiger midfield and Hummels too. It wouldn't be very good idea to splash all of that on Pogba and Barkley.