NMF
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,932
160K a week surely that's not right
Since fairly recently, although things can accelerate pretty quickly in that sector. Twitter users are falling, the stock price has fallen and the CEO has dumped a load of shares. Not sure what your reference to Facebook is about.
Ben Fairthorne doesn't exist. Well, maybe he does but he certainly isn't a journo who has worked with x, y and z company and has a zillion sources. He's indykaila with a dicky bow.
When I, and a lot of others, view the twitter thread, we want to see actual news, not utter crap spouted by ITK69 about something plucked from their arsecrack and retweeted and favourited into oblivion just because it links Suarez with a move to Caledonian Thistle or some other nonsense.
It might very well be true. We paying Ashley Young around 120k aren't we? Also, we weren't the only club in for him with Chelsea also sniffing around so I don't think it's that unbelievable that we've 'out offered' Chelsea to make sure we get our man.
Like feck we'll pay an 18yr old 160k.
Goal.com strikes again.
Highly doubt he'll come in and be our 3rd/4th highest earner. Hardly a credible source either.
Its also on marca and sport. Anyone know how good he is?
160k a week for Shaw sounds like something Chelsea would leak, giving their fans an excuse as to why they couldn't get him perhaps?
Quoted just for the lols.If Shaw is on 160k a week, then i will eat my left nut
160k a week for Shaw sounds like something Chelsea would leak, giving their fans an excuse as to why they couldn't get him perhaps?
Joe cole completes a medical! What does a medical consist of off?
Oh right, yeah, I just meant another internet 'has been' like MySpace is now.Myspace mate...ffs..facebook destroyed myspace
Cracking left foot.
Joe cole completes a medical! What does a medical consist of off?
160k a week for Shaw sounds like something Chelsea would leak, giving their fans an excuse as to why they couldn't get him perhaps?
£160k pw?
It seems too crazy to be made up completely. I mean, if you're going to make stuff up you'd at least try to make it believable.It's more likely to be the case that Goal have just made the information up.
It seems too crazy to be made up completely. I mean, if you're going to make stuff up you'd at least try to make it believable.
If we're going to ban BS accounts then we may as well ban tweets that use The Mirror as a source too.
If we're going to ban BS accounts then we may as well ban tweets that use The Mirror as a source too.