walkinhop
Full Member
I for one don't care about the small difference in the fees. All i know is from a big club point of view, we are a complete joke.
Who is the answer in your eyes, in the situation we're currently in?
Maths isn't Ducker's strong point it seems. Still gets confused with with pound - euro exchange rates. He still thinks we spent £30m+ on Anderson.
Balague saying the deal is E25m + Navas valued at E15M isn't he?
No, but we've probably broken the FA's fax machine...Have we broken the internet yet ?![]()
Selling Hernandez and loaning Wilson is great news because it means we're definitely getting someone better, possibly 2 players. Not sure about Januzaj who I thought should be a cover for Mata on the right.
I think it's more the fact, that the club has saying all summer DDG isn't going anywhere, then we sell him on the Spanish deadline day.It's more "fun" to mock the club, though.
We're getting around 17 million plus Navas, who I imagine would be worth at least 13 million. Around 30 million for a keeper with a year to go is fine.
It is a decent deal for us when you consider that we are getting 25 mil for a keeper with only one year left on his deal, who doesn't want to be here. We're also getting Navas. That said, Real Madrid are basically letting us take Navas off their hands, and getting De Gea in return for only 25 mil - if he had 5 years left on his deal, he would be worth several times that. They have their GK department sorted for the next 10/15 years.
I for one don't care about the small difference in the fees. All i know is from a big club point of view, we are a complete joke.
Ross is 29 years old and at Championship level.Chich only had a year left on his contract didn't he?
All these favours we're doing West Brom surely we can discuss Berahino..
It's an excellent deal. Getting 29mil in itself would be top drawer for a keeper in the last year of his contract. Getting someone like navas on top of it excellent.
We do have a goalkeeping coach. I'm sure Hoek won't just sit on his arse.So you believe them not me, fair enough. However why not use context? I said he has superb reflexes and makes flashy saves, that's great. However you and them are not looking at the actual huge differences between the PL and La Liga, it's a simple case of him not having the right skill set for this league and at nearly 29 he isn't suddenly going to develop them.
Did the club say it or did twitter journalists?I think it's more the fact, that the club has saying all summer DDG isn't going anywhere, then we sell him on the Spanish deadline day.
Hope so, bringing him in along with Martial would give our attack a breath of fresh air.Who's to say we haven't
Like I said, circumstances taken into consideration and all that, it is a very good deal for us. I just think that Real will be the happier of two clubs. It's as win-win as it was going to get, but Real have just signed the only goalkeeper in the world that is even close to Neuer. I'm very happy we are signing Navas, of course. Always rated him.
I think it's more the fact, that the club has saying all summer DDG isn't going anywhere, then we sell him on the Spanish deadline day.
How the feck do Real win here? It's an excellent deal for us.
I think it's more the fact, that the club has saying all summer DDG isn't going anywhere, then we sell him on the Spanish deadline day.
We do have a goalkeeping coach. I'm sure Hoek won't just sit on his arse.
then who's the answer? Lloris? The one who keeps making blunders on fairly regular basis. or someone else? Navas was great prior to joining RM.Real Madrid's games are on every week on Sky Sports and I watch them all, plus I saw him in the World Cup, so count how many games that is and that is how often I saw him over the last year.
Romero is crap but Navas isn't the answer.
The negativity on here is a really crushing my soul. Shit support.
We've got a massive downgrade in GK, being forced to take Navas as there's no time to get somebody better. Money in the bank granted but that's only "excellent" for the Glazers. In football terms, it's horrible.
So by your logic if some player has skills for La liga he can't learn some new skills which are necessary for PL?You either have certain skills or you don't, he's got his skills and they are suited to the league he was in where everything is on the deck. That logic is like suggesting we can coach Fellaini to play like Ibra.
then who's the answer? Lloris? The one who keeps making blunders on fairly regular basis. or someone else? Navas was great prior to joining RM.
We've got a massive downgrade in GK, being forced to take Navas as there's no time to get somebody better. Money in the bank granted but that's only "excellent" for the Glazers. In football terms, it's horrible.
How is this possibly a bad deal for us? Yes, we should have secured him to a long term contract and the fact we didn't is unforgivable. But... Given the circumstances, £29m plus Navas is excellent. We would have taken £35m before today, so this is very good business. Navas is a professional and if he didn't want to come, he was under zero obligation. Hopefully the only positive thing (apart from the deal which i believe is very good for us bearing in mind DDG's contract situation) is that it will make the club realise that you cannot allow a player like this to run down his contract.