You're right, that's negotiation 101, put the lowest price possible as the first.This club really is clueless. Put it down to 40m and we'll a good few clubs wanting him. Now we'll be stuck with a useless CB and pay him dumb wages.
You're right, that's negotiation 101, put the lowest price possible as the first.This club really is clueless. Put it down to 40m and we'll a good few clubs wanting him. Now we'll be stuck with a useless CB and pay him dumb wages.
Of course I'm right even if you think you're being a smartass.You're right, that's negotiation 101, put the lowest price possible as the first.
Exactly that. Asking for £50m just makes it more likely we get about 40m instead of settling for 30m.No different to Chelsea valuing Mount at £80m. Just sets a point for negotiation.
….& yet you’ll complain that we could have got more when we sell them for nothingOf course I'm right even if you think you're being a smartass.
No point playing negotiation games when clubs won't even engage on the transfer in the first place. You're the same people who'll cheerlead Murtough leaving the negotiations instantly when being quoted a dumb valuation, yet you feel us putting ridiculous price tags on our unneeded scrubs is some 4d-chess move.
And this is not the first time we've done something like this btw. We priced out players like Romero and Rojo out of a move and they barely played after. Same shit with Lingard.
Just all around dumb decision-making but you delusional lot think we're somehow run like Bayern over here.
Absolutely clueless. Why don’t they just haemorrhage cash and burn the club to the ground. Great plan.This club really is clueless. Put it down to 40m and we'll have a good few clubs wanting him. Now we'll be stuck with a useless CB and pay him dumb wages.
Happy Onana week everybody!!
I like how you know what I'll say in the future. Great argument, shame it's complete bollocks, of course.….& yet you’ll complain that we could have got more when we sell them for nothing
His Salary. If a big club wants him, we could sell him for at least 25-35 million. He is an international so there is that.Why shouldn't we be able to get decent money for England CB Maguire? Just because he doesn't fit into our system, doesn't mean he won't look good for...errrr.
Anyway, maybe we can sell him to Chelsea, they like throwing their money around.
No different to Chelsea valuing Mount at £80m. Just sets a point for negotiation.
50M for Maguire
Of course it's different.
Chelsea held the cards because we were approaching them. With Maguire we are trying to shift him, if we value him to high then no one will be interested.
We are unlikely to receive more than 10m for him, though
There will be a whole host of mid table clubs in for Maguire, and a fair few would definitely pay around £35m for him which is I expect a negotiated fee to end up being.
Personally, I would be very happy if we sell Maguire for 25. And in this case it’s not even mandatory to buy a replacement this year - we can just have Bailly for his final year as 5th choice and then release himAre you telling me a club like West Ham or Everton wouldn't want Maguire at £25 million ? West Ham even have players at 130-150k a week - so Maguire wouldn't need to drop much in wages to be well within their wage structure
I agree, although not sure how Bailly would feel given previous comments, the price tag I guess is in part down to his England tag, but IMO this is only going to decrease I can see England appearances dropping if he cannot get game time at Utd, may even be the main motivation for him to leavePersonally, I would be very happy if we sell Maguire for 25. And in this case it’s not even mandatory to buy a replacement this year - we can just have Bailly for his final year as 5th choice and then release him
Speaking of Bailly, is he gone yet?I agree, although not sure how Bailly would feel given previous comments, the price tag I guess is in part down to his England tag, but IMO this is only going to decrease I can see England appearances dropping if he cannot get game time at Utd, may even be the main motivation for him to leave
How do you know we’ve had no enquiries?Of course it's different.
Chelsea held the cards because we were approaching them. No one is approaching us for Maguire.
No, he is still under contract, as is Alex TellesSpeaking of Bailly, is he gone yet?
How do you know we’ve had no enquiries?
Chelsea didn’t hold the cards at all. They had a player coming into his last year who turned down a renewal. They wanted the deal as much as we did, yet set their price to negotiate from.
You set your position early to negotiate from, not complicated really.
Just waiting on West Ham to get their £105mOf course it's different.
Chelsea held the cards because we were approaching them. No one is approaching us for Maguire YET
Don’t try to be condescending. I know the difference exactly. You’re trying to make out that Chelsea were reluctant sellers, they weren’t, they needed to cash in on an asset that was going to leave for free, especially due to their need to recoup some of their crazy spending, we knew that, hence the negotiation.I fail to see how you can't see the difference between buying power and selling power in the two difference cases, but ok.
Use the tweet specific thread for tweetsAny … tweets?
Use the tweet specific thread for tweets
God I am so tired of this deal - it's close, it's in its final stages, It's almost there.....get it done.
God I am so tired of this deal - it's close, it's in its final stages, It's almost there.....get it done.
Where were you for the Sneijder days? Also Strootman
think of her sister, think of her sister...God I am so tired of this deal - it's close, it's in its final stages, It's almost there.....get it done.