red_de_pologne
Full Member
It's not, he can't come on loan.
why not?
It's not, he can't come on loan.
Tier 2:
It's been posted in other threads but he has only 6 months left on his contract, apparently in Germany that means a loan is not permissible.why not?
He got voted Preston’s second greatest player in a pole not long after he left second to the legendary Tom Finney so it must off worked out wellI doubt Beckham really developed during his time at Preston - it was more that he was so impressive in those few matches that Ferguson were convinced he was ready. He only played 5 matches there.
He got voted Preston’s second greatest player in a pole not long after he left second to the legendary Tom Finney so it must off worked out well
So Rasmus only striker for rest of the season,praying he doesn't get injured and Rashford ends up playing there
Because we were most likely already overspent before those deals. Not that they'll have saved us much anyway. And we've lost out on £15m+ by crashing out of Europe.Wouldn't a loan space have been freed up with Reguillon going back?
Then when you add Sancho, Hannibal, Gore, Hugill, (Pellistri*)... How can the finances still be so tight?
Well said, Yoda.Disgusting the state of our finances
Proof is in the pudding and it’s now 25th January so if they are going to do something it needs to be soontight finances for even loans? feck me might as well pack up the season
still think that's got to be bs
Season could have been packed up months ago.tight finances for even loans? feck me might as well pack up the season
still think that's got to be bs
Day of contacts between Granada and Manchester United to unblock the negotiation of Facundo Pellistri but still no green light from the English club.
Granada still believe they are in the race, but more time is needed. The parties will continue to work in the coming hours.
Unless there is a ridiculous out going transfer in the next couple days, no one is coming in. Prepare for 4 months of Rashford up front.
Disgusting the state of our finances
So what? Why does anyone even want us to panic loan some shite forward? We're better off doing nothing until competent people are put in placeThis is why Murtough is a bum. A club like United, and we dont even have the funds for our customary emergency shit loan striker.
Agree.So what? Why does anyone even want us to panic loan some shite forward? We're better off doing nothing until competent people are put in place
The only thing I would say is that we have a 20 year old striker who has a back problem that is being managed, our season is basically over already barring the FA Cup so maybe we just leave Hojlund out of some league games but we really don't have much cover for him. We need to get away from the short term signings but we also need to make sure we protect Hojlund.So what? Why does anyone even want us to panic loan some shite forward? We're better off doing nothing until competent people are put in place
I fully agree.If only Ten Hag hadn't wasted 55 million on an average Chelsea player who has done the square root of eff all since he arrived. That transfer gets more bizarre and ridiculous every day.
Agree.
Save the money, and prepare for next season. EtH already got enough for top 4 or to progress from CL group.
I fully agree.
Hojlund and Onana I actually could see the reason for even though we again overpaid.
Hojlund for potential
Onana for how he can play out from the back, just too bad he is not as strong with his hands :-)
But Mount was injury proned before he came, he had been crap for Chealsea for a while, his best position is the same as Bruno and he was overpriced. On top of this we gave him a salary that is way above his worth, so not possible to sell again.
Assuming 5th is enough to get CL next season, do you really expect us to overcome the 8 point gap over the remaining 17 games when we cannot score for toffee and look like conceding every attack.
I am not saying we should not have prioritized diffenrently. Maybe a CB, but who could now we would have so many injuries in defense this year.We didn’t need to buy Onana. De Gea would have been fine for another season and the £50m could have purchased a decent CH. Ball playing GK may be fine but first and foremost they need to be able to keep the ball out the net. Plus with a solid CH, how much better would our defence be? Last summer our purchases in the main were baffling. £200m+ to make the team weaker. Plus in both summers ETH has over spent knowingly in the summer which means in the Jan window we were / are penniless.
De De Gea-Onana debacle is a perfect example of the chaos around the club, and the lack of awareness of some fans.
DeGea was offered an extension on the same huge wages until Ten Hag intervened. It’s good that he did.
I was in favor of keeping De Gea for another year on lower wages. That wasn’t going to happen. So we needed to replace him instead of overpaying him another year, because well run clubs don’t do that.
I’m glad that Onana is here though, he is such an obvious improvement playing out the back. He did help botch our CL campaign, but the whole team is responsible for that. He will be fine.
Anyway to say that we should have kept De Gea makes no sense, financially and football wise.
Where we really failed is in not getting a world class CB. Instead we are lining up with Maguire and Evans ( who is a brilliant backup signing). That is just really poor management.