Kane fits better in my opinion. A more all round striker, intelligent, creative as well as a goalscorer.
He's also a much safer bet as he's 100% prem-proven, and will be £30-40m cheaper.
Kane fits better in my opinion. A more all round striker, intelligent, creative as well as a goalscorer.
He's also a much safer bet as he's 100% prem-proven, and will be £30-40m cheaper.
I dont think there is truth in this at all.
Kane would command more joining bonus and higher wages(atleast 100-150k more than Osimhen) as he is in his final big contract. So over five years we are looking at atleast 30-40m more than Osimhen wages. So, even if Kane is bought for 75m and Osimhen for 120m , financially Osimhen deal is better because he still will be an asset after 5 years.
If we assume Osimhen and Kane would offer same output then Osimhen is a no brainer. But I think Kane would be an instant impact for us and would help in getting premier league title, but I havent watched much of Osimhen either.
Kane fits better in my opinion. A more all round striker, intelligent, creative as well as a goalscorer.
He's also a much safer bet as he's 100% prem-proven, and will be £30-40m cheaper.
I dont think there is truth in this at all.
Kane would command more joining bonus and higher wages(atleast 100-150k more than Osimhen) as he is in his final big contract. So over five years we are looking at atleast 30-40m more than Osimhen wages. So, even if Kane is bought for 75m and Osimhen for 120m , financially Osimhen deal is better because he still will be an asset after 5 years.
If we assume Osimhen and Kane would offer same output then Osimhen is a no brainer. But I think Kane would be an instant impact for us and would help in getting premier league title, but I havent watched much of Osimhen either.
Does he? I think Kane is pretty much perfect for what Ten Hag wants
How?I mean he would make him work but Osimhen fits Ten Hags systems better.
Kane occupies Brunos position a lot. I still say we will go for Victor first
Osimhen is quick, aggressive and presses well. I think ETH will favour a move for him. Whether we have the money for him is a different story.
I think Kane has dropped deep more in recent seasons just because Spurs haven't had a #10 worth a feck for a good while, so he has to do everything himself.
He had his best goalscoring seasons with Eriksen and Alli filling those areas, which let him play more like a typical #9 than he does now. I'm sure he can go back to that with the service he'd get here.
I would imagine we'll only send Elanga on loan if there isn't much interest, or a club isn't willing to pay what we want. He's hardly played for us and even less so since the January transfer window so I think it's fairly clear he's not in ETH's plan.A loan for Elanga? Seems like now would be the time to cash in and make some money.
Doesn't Haaland's release clause kick in next summer? Maybe they are lining it up so Osimhen comes in as an immediate replacement. Don't think he'd suit them more than he would us, though.Why would City want Osimhen? Makes zero sense.
Doesn't Haaland's release clause kick in next summer? Maybe they are lining it up so Osimhen comes in as an immediate replacement. Don't think he'd suit them more than he would us, though.
Tier 2:
Think the more likely explanation would be that Plettenberg knows feck all.
The PSG link is just as inane.Why would City want Osimhen? Makes zero sense.
10How many big money keepers do those feckers need?
Tier 2:
United are very serious about Osimhen even if he's difficult to attain.
Tier 2:
Tier 2:
Tier 2:
Why would City want Osimhen? Makes zero sense.
Translation - 'we would absolutely love to sign Harry Kane but we're not going to be held over a barrel. Good luck to Spurs with finding another buyer in this market. Of course, if they were to lower the price a little and bring forward a deal....'
Tier 2: