Bubz27
No I won’t change your tag line
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 22,019
Liverpool are so lucky all their release clauses are less than reported.
No, Roma has never been a possibility and when Monchi was there I was at Real Madrid. I’ve had offers to coach in Italy in the last year though. Serie A is a tremendously interesting championship and clearly growing, I don’t rule out going there. Even sooner than you think.
This is so City. Scoop up a guy like this to get some prime years for a decent price. Will end up brilliant under Pep.
Source (Tier 1): José Félix Díaz
- Gabri Veiga's release clause amount: €30m
- Celta Vigo tried to improve Veiga's contract and increase his release clause amount, but the player hasn't entertained their offers.
Turns out there are a lot of different people on the Caf with a diverse set of opinions, who knew?Yet if we were about to sign him there'd be people saying things like "what do our scouts actually do, this is so lazy, the club's a mess!".
When can we sign PL on a free?
I know he can discuss deals with non-PL clubs now and has been able to since 1st January but do we, and other English clubs, have to wait until the contract actually runs out?
I had 1st June in my head
I think according to FM back in the day it was always June 1st.
Tier 1:
Yet if we were about to sign him there'd be people saying things like "what do our scouts actually do, this is so lazy, the club's a mess!".
60M to Liverpool or anyone else. To United it would be 100 mill plus a kidney and a reach around.If Liverpool are paying around £60M for this World Cup winning, ever present Brighton player. Then out of favour Mount should be half that.
If Liverpool are paying around £60M for this World Cup winning, ever present Brighton player. Then out of favour Mount should be half that.
Mount isn't out favour.
So why don't you want to keep him?
Appreciate he's currently injured though.
Assume he means Conference League final?
Player and club can't come to an agreement re; wages, contract length and I read something about image rights being a problem too. United are apparently offering him a contract that suits his needs.
I think the club acted poorly with him though. Apparently he was very close to agreeing a new deal before the WC, around the time Reece James signed his extension, but he was negotiating directly with Boehly at the time, who was still the acting sporting director back then. After the WC, we had two new sporting directors who were handling this and they decided to try and rework a deal that works better for the club, which Mount rejected. Then they offered him a 1 year extension on huge wages to give themselves time negotiate properly (this was around the time Potter was sacked) and he rejected that too.
Then all we were told was Boehly and Mount would sit for a chat and in that meeting Mount allegedly told Boehly he was unhappy with how this contract negotiation was handled and that United were offering him a deal he couldn't refuse. Since then Mount to United news have gathered pace so I presume Chelsea haven't been able to present a deal that matches what he's getting from United.
Yet if we were about to sign him there'd be people saying things like "what do our scouts actually do, this is so lazy, the club's a mess!".