Smores
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2011
- Messages
- 26,309
We're so going to get rinsed for any player this summer. Let's hope we've found targets with release clauses.
Spending on the next manager?
I think everything points to Ten Hag. He has a 25 million release clause so why spend that money on players he might not potentially like.
Spending on the next manager?
I think everything points to Ten Hag. He has a 25 million release clause so why spend that money on players he might not potentially like.
Chelsea will sign Rice, Madrid will sign Tchouameni and we’ll end up overspending on some fall back option who will turn out not to be good enough to be in the first 11.It seems like both United and Chelsea have Rice and Tchouameni on their lists. Tchouameni is gonna be difficult to sign due to the competition, so I can see Chelsea wrapping up a deal for Rice, due to the player's affiliation with the club.
Fast-forward to August...
Ralf is permanent manager.
Of course it was. Our DOF is basically our manager right now and we're still waiting for the new manager to pick the players he wants. Of course the new manager will also be picked by the DOF who is also our current manager.Was the whole DOF thing just for show? Back to rebuilding every new manager and giving up midseason if they get sacked? Our planning basically amounts to signing the next Fergie.
It's bullshit reasoning to penny pinch. You think if for example we signed a Vlahovic or a Declan Rice do you honestly think any new manager would refuse to work with them ? Or even a Haidara or a Bissouma a new manager wouldn't even want them in the squad come summer ?"We want to make sure that we give ourselves the worst chance to be in the Champions League next season so that the new manager finds it harder to sign top talent and we find it harder to persuade them to join us".
Seems entirely sensible.
I understand the argument against signing a big name player for a lot of money that the next manager might not want but we are going to be threadbare come summer anyway and there are plenty of players we could have taken a gamble on for under £50m. Even if they only help us to get CL football that would probably be money well spent.
He's been getting them for a while, to be fair. This isn't new from him.This guy all of a sudden is getting sound bytes from someone within the club. Now that Woodward has left, it has to be one of Murtough or Fletcher.
Maybe our long term targets were not available. Plus it was just started. This makes sense if we dont end up hiring RalfThis is rather idiotic approach. Don't we have a DoF exactly for this reason? It doesn't matter who is the coach if DoF is building for the long term. This suggests to me that the club didn't really change anything.
We were also less shit back then and only a year from winning our last title. Our stock has seriously fallen since and high wages seems to be our only selling point these days.
Howson has been saying we won't sign anyone unless it was a long term target. Whoever was available the powers at be figure they're not good enough that any manager would gladly accept them.Maybe our long term targets were not available. Plus it was just started. This makes sense if we dont end up hiring Ralf
I mean for sure we don't have to sign someone just for the sake of it. But I would expect the club to brief the press exactly how you wrote it just now. Our long term targets weren't available.Maybe our long term targets were not available. Plus it was just started. This makes sense if we dont end up hiring Ralf
Howson has been saying we won't sign anyone unless it was a long term target. Whoever was available the powers at be figure they're not good enough that any manager would gladly accept them.
If it was Bellingham or Rice available we would have signed them regardless of the manager.
The owners have a very long term plan : squeeze the club as much as possible as long as possible. If the money is there, they don’t care about the rest…
I wouldn't be surprised in the least.
We love to act like we have a long term plan, when it changes daily.
Weird considering they've conceded 53 goals and should be desperately trying to sign him.
Well that would be peak banter.
I mean Bordeaux literally tried to sign him.It’s not weird. Nobody is trying to sign him for a reason. He’s basically finished.
This is rather idiotic approach. Don't we have a DoF exactly for this reason? It doesn't matter who is the coach if DoF is building for the long term. This suggests to me that the club didn't really change anything.
I mean Bordeaux literally tried to sign him.
Was the whole DOF thing just for show? Back to rebuilding every new manager and giving up midseason if they get sacked? Our planning basically amounts to signing the next Fergie.
Of course it was. Our DOF is basically our manager right now and we're still waiting for the new manager to pick the players he wants. Of course the new manager will also be picked by the DOF who is also our current manager.
What a mess.
You say that now but what if there's another VDB situation and the next manager just doesn't fancy the player we bought. Then the club still did wrong. It's never a good idea for an interim to buy players.Again we have learnt nothing. Giving managers complete control over transfers has resulted in the squad we have. We should be planning for transfers based on a club philosophy not who the manager is every few years.
Create a club philosophy and get managers based on that and players based on that. It won't always be right but this is much better than letting manager decide everything.You say that now but what if there's another VDB situation and the next manager just doesn't fancy the player we bought. Then the club still did wrong. It's never a good idea for an interim to buy players.
You've got it the wrong way around. Ever since Fergie/Gill left, United's transfers have been handled by the club's accountants.Again we have learnt nothing. Giving managers complete control over transfers has resulted in the squad we have. We should be planning for transfers based on a club philosophy not who the manager is every few years.