Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
mazhar13 said:


I wasn't expecting Hannes Wolf to be linked to Swansea. What are the circumstances here? Has he been that bad in recent weeks/months?
Click to expand...


3 goals 2 assists in 44 BuLi matches, featured 8 minutes in Gladbach's last 13 matches, despite never being injured. Gladbach loaned him last year, probably because Rose knew him from Salzburg.

He always looked out of his depth, yet Rose kept subbing him on every single game, until it triggered an obligation to buy him. Which was also around the same time Rose himself must have comitted to Dortmund. :lol:

He must be one of the most frustrating Transfer stories in Gladbach's recent history, that €10m they paid for him was money they could have used to extend Ginter's contract.
 
do.ob said:
3 goals 2 assists in 44 BuLi matches, featured 8 minutes in Gladbach's last 13 matches, despite never being injured. Gladbach loaned him last year, probably because Rose knew him from Salzburg.

He always looked out of his depth, yet Rose kept subbing him on every single game, until it triggered an obligation to buy him. Which was also around the same time Rose himself must have comitted to Dortmund. :lol:

He must be one of the most frustrating Transfer stories in Gladbach's recent history, that €10m they paid for him was money they could have used to extend Ginter's contract.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, he definitely struggled to produce at Gladbach, but he wasn't that useless, was he? I do remember him having some decent moments last season where he'd offer more directness and attacking intensity. I just didn't think that he'd be linked to Swansea of all clubs. It might work out for him given that his playing style might suit Swansea and the Championship in general, but personally, I wasn't expecting Wolf to be linked to Swansea.
 
mazhar13 said:
A bunch of big clubs are keeping track of Jonathan David. We'll see who actually makes a move for him in the summer.
Click to expand...


Reminds me of Rooney to an extent. Good finisher who has the footballing intelligence to also interlink the play, good balance on the ball, has the physicality to play in the league.
 
Class of 1902 said:
So what exactly is our plan, are we still trying to convince him to a sign a new deal ffs
Click to expand...
The only possibility that remains is selling Lingard this month to a club that's not a top 4 rival. That'll be difficult for United given Lingard's current suitors. I don't think there's a team outside of the Premier League that's particularly keen on Lingard, either, so the club's hands are tied.
 
mazhar13 said:
The only possibility that remains is selling Lingard this month to a club that's not a top 4 rival. That'll be difficult for United given Lingard's current suitors. I don't think there's a team outside of the Premier League that's particularly keen on Lingard, either, so the club's hands are tied.
Click to expand...
Entirely of our own making. Should have got rid in the summer on the back of his impressive stint.
 
mazhar13 said:
The only possibility that remains is selling Lingard this month to a club that's not a top 4 rival. That'll be difficult for United given Lingard's current suitors. I don't think there's a team outside of the Premier League that's particularly keen on Lingard, either, so the club's hands are tied.
Click to expand...
Zoo said:
Click to expand...

The people who run our club have got to be the dumbest feckfaces in the world.

Get a loan fee from Newcastle, and let him go there on loan, let them cover 100% of his wages and then he's gone in the summer. That's a good move that suits all parties! Why are we so dumb when it comes to moving players on.
 
mazhar13 said:
Oh yeah, he definitely struggled to produce at Gladbach, but he wasn't that useless, was he? I do remember him having some decent moments last season where he'd offer more directness and attacking intensity. I just didn't think that he'd be linked to Swansea of all clubs. It might work out for him given that his playing style might suit Swansea and the Championship in general, but personally, I wasn't expecting Wolf to be linked to Swansea.
Click to expand...

I think intensity was the one thing he actually consistently brought to the table. Other than that it was maybe a few hopeful moments here and there, but otherwise mostly a player, who was visibly out of his depth. But having said that: Gladbach paid €11m for him, so he's probably on fairly generous wages for someone with his performances. It could be that, because of Corona, Gladbach have a firm position (e.g. no free loan, not paying part of the wages) and no club in Bundesliga wants to take a gamble like him currently, so Swansea get him, because they are the only ones willing to spend the money.
 
PoTMS said:
We were successful. It didn't stop Ronaldo, Rooney, Tevez, etc. all wanting to leave at the peak of our success. Whereas you'd never hear Mane, Salah, De Bruyne or Aguero grumble.
Click to expand...
You discount the likes of Keane, scholes, giggs, all whom had offers to go to Italy at their peaks.
 
do.ob said:
I think intensity was the one thing he actually consistently brought to the table. Other than that it was maybe a few hopeful moments here and there, but otherwise mostly a player, who was visibly out of his depth. But having said that: Gladbach paid €11m for him, so he's probably on fairly generous wages for someone with his performances. It could be that, because of Corona, Gladbach have a firm position (e.g. no free loan, not paying part of the wages) and no club in Bundesliga wants to take a gamble like him currently, so Swansea get him, because they are the only ones willing to spend the money.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's a fair point. He'll probably make up for what they've been missing ever since Dan James left them, so even if he's not getting a ton of goals + assists, he can definitely improve their goalscoring prospects, overall.
 
The Corinthian said:
The people who run our club have got to be the dumbest feckfaces in the world.

Get a loan fee from Newcastle, and let him go there on loan, let them cover 100% of his wages and then he's gone in the summer. That's a good move that suits all parties! Why are we so dumb when it comes to moving players on.
Click to expand...

Did they offer to cover 100% of his wages and does Lingard want to go there?
 
AltiUn said:
Lower fee? They're the richest club ever, just pay it you tight feckers :lol:
Click to expand...

I was thinking the same :lol:

Although they do have to start as they mean to go on. If they get a reputation for paying over the odds now they'll be in awful trouble by the time they're in the market for the Haaland's/Mbappe's of this world.
 


Federico Pastorello met up with Edu at Arsenal's headquarters regarding Arthur.

Source:
 
Red&Black said:
this isnt aimed at you, but since I saw it, thought id comment... Saw this exact type quote in the Bailly thread. There wasnt a single report saying Milan werent willing to pay his wages. The club and reports were very clear that only a 6mos loan was wanted/needed, so actual summer targets for CB could be acquired.

I get that Serie A, for the most part, can't pay EPL wages... But that isn't an entirely bad thing either, considering what guys like Martial make.

There are players (like Martial) who clubs will have to pay part of the wages to loan them out. Not many clubs can 1) afford it 2) want to pay that on a dart throw.
Click to expand...
Wonderful point. To add to it, this is exactly why we, along with a lot of other premier league teams, get to cherry pick players from other leagues. We can offer them better wages, but this makes it a double edged sword.

Paying more than others means everyone wants to join you, but no one is willing to leave too. We can't really have it both ways.
 
Mick1 said:
Paying more than others means everyone wants to join you, but no one is willing to leave too. We can't really have it both ways.
Click to expand...

And that's basically the start and end of it. Yes, you have the right "to get angry" at clubs from other countries wanting you to pay part of the wages, but it's only because we don't pay those types of wages to players. You do. So if you want to benefit from the loan, from either a performance or financial aspect, you have to help out.

I can imagine it being frustrating for you, but so is losing players to the EPL for astronomical wages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mazhar13
Official: Yazici leaves Lille for CSKA Moscow on loan with a purchase option.


They've already got his replacement in:
 
sparx99 said:
Doesn’t signing Pogba help them keep Raiola sweet? Kroos and Modric aren’t getting any younger.
Click to expand...

Keeping sweet? Pogba and fat man will want at least €50m sign on fee, plus the €500k a week wage.

I think Haaland will want a move to either Barca or Real no matter what Raiola says.
 


Confirmed is a strong word, but there you go. I'm guessing the Tweet's based on this from Falk:
 


Translated summary:


Valencia are eyeing up Mingueza to replace Wass for this season. Mingueza's contract expires in 2023.
 
yumtum said:
Keeping sweet? Pogba and fat man will want at least €50m sign on fee, plus the €500k a week wage.

I think Haaland will want a move to either Barca or Real no matter what Raiola says.
Click to expand...

I don’t think Pogba gets that kind of deal anywhere this summer. He’s been too injury prone and too poor on the pitch to command that sign on fee and wages. Maybe Newcastle if that’s what he wants but none of the big European clubs will pay it.
 
PoTMS said:
We were successful. It didn't stop Ronaldo, Rooney, Tevez, etc. all wanting to leave at the peak of our success. Whereas you'd never hear Mane, Salah, De Bruyne or Aguero grumble.
Click to expand...

Rooney wanted to leave when we replaced Ronaldo with Bebe. Tevez, iirc, didn't want to leave. We didn't want to pay the money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.