Lash
Full Member
Nah, it's just a load of fence sitting by the journoThat the football people at United want him , but the money men (e.g Glazers) probably dont want to pay the money unless outgoings are happening
Nah, it's just a load of fence sitting by the journoThat the football people at United want him , but the money men (e.g Glazers) probably dont want to pay the money unless outgoings are happening
He was there, but he's now back in Portugal.
The dominoes are falling...
Either way, we have to react.They've agreed terms other than the term they haven’t agreed?
It would mean that United are more willing to bring in Trippier/a new right back, though. Dalot is the #2 right back being Wan-Bissaka, and him leaving would mean that United are going after a new right back.Big big big mistake if we have no RB in first. We can’t let Wan Bissaka play every single game again
Also don’t think this will mean the dominoes are falling if it’s a loan. Nothing to reinvest
Next domino = Trippier on a loan with an obligation to buy?Big big big mistake if we have no RB in first. We can’t let Wan Bissaka play every single game again
Also don’t think this will mean the dominoes are falling if it’s a loan. Nothing to reinvest
It'll be City if they get RonaldoChelsea will prolly have the best squad in Europe let alone England.
I hope Bailey is right. Having said that, I know different journos (sometimes) hear different things, but I can't see it happening for us.This is very deflating news to hear, we’re the ones who need him most..
They've agreed terms other than the term they haven’t agreed?
It would mean that United are more willing to bring in Trippier/a new right back, though. Dalot is the #2 right back being Wan-Bissaka, and him leaving would mean that United are going after a new right back.
Yeah it’s all ok if we get Trippier of course.Next domino = Trippier on a loan with an obligation to buy?
This is very deflating news to hear, we’re the ones who need him most..
Yeah it’s all ok if we get Trippier of course.
Wouldn’t put it past Utd to let Dalot go and not replace him.
It is. But this Summer is showing that oil money is the future of football. Can’t compete with it
As much as City would want to sell him, who could even afford Sterling?
Yeah, possibly, but for now, they're targeting Richarlison. We'll see if they get linked to a 2nd forward.PSG?
Tough one. The Sterling rumours have been there since last season though.As much as City would want to sell him, who could even afford Sterling?
Yeah, possibly, but for now, they're targeting Richarlison. We'll see if they get linked to a 2nd forward.
I don’t think any club with fair money can compete with the clubs with oil money any more.Your club has plenty of money. You could get all these people if you had owners with more ambition.
I can't say for sure, but PSG are definitely interested.They are just the only club I can think of that will have the money. Is Neymar pushing the Richarlison signing?
I can't say for sure, but PSG are definitely interested.
They play in different positions. They need a striker now but don't need a LW after they just bought Grealish. Mahrez is still there and Jesus looks like he's moving to the wings with also Ferran Torres available. And I'm sure they have other options in case they need to.So let me get this straight, City will sell sterling to facilitate a move for a 36 year old Ronaldo?
I just don't see it.
I dunno why, but I can see Sterling at Bayern.As much as City would want to sell him, who could even afford Sterling?
I don’t think any club with fair money can compete with the clubs with oil money any more.
Sancho was a major signing but it was about 12 months in the making, probably with last seasons budget included. And no doubt if PSG, City or Chelsea (the dirty clubs) had prioritised him then they’d have blown us out the water
Hopefully they come in for Lingard to replace himEverton could make a killing from the deal.