- Milan is offering a 3-4 year contract
- Salary close to what he currently earns
- Raiola wants a bigger raise for his client
My meeting with FC Porto took place exactly a fortnight ago. It was not carried out to put any kind of pressure on the management or the coach for Felipe to play, as some people misinterpreted. Nothing is being discussed regarding Felipe Anderson’s future at the moment. He is an FC Porto player and is totally focused on his work at the club, training daily with full dedication to make his adaptation as short as possible. Anything that is said other than that is just speculation and should be treated as such.
At the beginning I thought I would have an important role to help the team seen how previous season ended by helping club reach the Champions League, but now I don't play often. I need a change, I will need to make a decision.
Not sure where isco would play other than as back up for brunoIsco + 40m and send Pogba other way.
Swap for odegaard and call it quitsIsco + 40m and send Pogba other way.
Of course you would like to have the player in the club as long as possible. On the other hand, it is also healthy if he takes the next step at the right time.
Let’s see what happens in winter, but there is a high probability that he will move to a big club. That is definitely a next step in development so that he can tap this potential and this performance with every game. (I’m) convinced that he can become one of the most interesting midfielders in Europe in the next few years.
If until end of Dec, Cavani flatters to deceive, I'll get this guy, contract until Jan 2022 minimum.
Two interchange natural CFs meant we're pushing Martial back to LW as he's more natural there and proving better left width more consistently than Rashford, with the latter on RW. Greenwood can rotate with either of the two wingers. Not like we have any better choices with James, Mata and Lingard left.
He suits PL, proven goalscorer here and always an annoying CF to play against. Strong impact roles.
Will be interesting whoever signs him. Isco will be crazy good if the team wants to retain possessionI could see Isco being the David Silva to Bruno's De Bruyne.
Chelsea might strike again with another very good deal
He's refuted by Ed Aarons, who's generally reliable when it comes to English football rumours.
It could also be that Chelsea have expressed some interest in signing Alaba, and that's as far as it's gone at this time. I don't think Zahavi needs to drum up too much interest for a player who has already attracted almost all of the big clubs.Interesting I wonder if that's Alaba's agent trying to drum up interest.
Don't take this Tweet too seriously.
Don't take this Tweet too seriously.
Why on Calhanoglu being linked to United or why on Falk?But (again) why ?
If VDB plays deeper then we are back to having no real cover for BrunoBut (again) why ?
He's been much better from last season, but he'll directly be competing with Bruno for that #10 role. He doesn't play that well out wide, and he's not defensively reliable enough in the deeper midfield roles. I'm thinking the fact that United are entertaining the agents' approaches is what's making this link so strong.I havent heard good things about this chap
Would probably mean Pogba is off and VdB is Pogba's replacement while the Milan player is back up to BrunoBut (again) why ?
It seems pointless when we have Bruno and VDB though. Wouldn't it make more sense to go for Grealish who can also operate from the left and centrally (assuming Rashford can perform on the opposite flank)He's been much better from last season, but he'll directly be competing with Bruno for that #10 role. He doesn't play that well out wide, and he's not defensively reliable enough in the deeper midfield roles. I'm thinking the fact that United are entertaining the agents' approaches is what's making this link so strong.