Fracture90
Full Member
Falk vs. Stone - battle of the whisperers.
does anyone else read those Romano "here we goes" to the tune of the Chemical Brothers "hey boy, hey girl"?
That's a fitting name for an agent.Sly dogs.
So if we get Sancho for reported €120m, considering that City have a sell-on clause, will we effectively be financing their Torres acquisition?
Oh great! I was really losing my sleep asking myself over and over again, whether or not you would care about it.Couldn't care less.
Oh great! I was really losing my sleep asking myself over and over again, whether or not you will be able to sleep because of it!
Sleep-ceptionOh great! I was really losing my sleep asking myself over and over again, whether or not you would care about it.
It was an interesting observation, no need to get your knickers twisted because of it.Why would it matter though? Shouldn't we get him because of it?
do they have a sell on clause?So if we get Sancho for reported €120m, considering that City have a sell-on clause, will we effectively be financing their Torres acquisition?
We have our own strengths too, which other PL club can point to a couple £100m talents in Rashford and Greenwood all of whom we got for free. If you look at the impact Rashford, Greenwood, McTominay and William's have had I think it balances out in the end.It was an interesting observation, no need to get your knockers twisted because of it.
Right winger that had a good individual season at Valencia, going for less than €30m is interesting. Wonder why we can't do deals like this...
Wanted first team football, so signs for Lille.....who then sends him on loan to the Bottom half of the Primeira Liga, Boavista. Makes sense.
Wanted first team football, so signs for Lille.....who then sends him on loan to the Bottom half of the Primeira Liga, Boavista. Makes sense.
Wanted first team football, so signs for Lille.....who then sends him on loan to the Bottom half of the Primeira Liga, Boavista. Makes sense.
Well yeah it does, he'll be getting first team football.
Dunno, it was purely hypothetical from my part.do they have a sell on clause?
So because we got a lot of talent coming through we should not try to get good talent for cheap as well? Are those two mutually exclusive?We have our own strengths too, which other PL club can point to a couple £100m talents in Rashford and Greenwood all of whom we got for free. If you look at the impact Rashford, Greenwood, McTominay and William's have had I think it balances out in the end.
We overpay for the players we need but we have a you set up that gives us two superstars, a potential DM for the next ten years and a utility player. That is before the likes of Tuanzebe and Henderson are factored in. How much is that in saved transfer fees?
Can't see Norwich selling him for that cheap.Absolute bargain if it's true about 10m deal. Liverpool are good at this transfer lark.
Is he a defender
Something we apparently prevented him from doing, even though he wanted to go on loan.It does make no sense, as he could have gone on loan whilst under contract with us