dev1l
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 9,598
Can somebody please tell this thing to these irresponsible folks at Chelsea? They don't seem to mind spending despite empty stadiums do they?I think we can all forget the Sancho deal. I knew we were losing money but feck me 5mil per game is a massive loss. Before January we will lose 70 mil. That is Sancho money.
I took it as not many - maybe I’m being glass half empty but made most senseWhat is he even saying? There are a few options, or there are few (not many) options? Regardless of whatever he says, there's tens of options
I think we will sign Badiashile, and Telles this coming week. Bale could come instead of Sancho. ??
Wish I could answer.What is he even saying? There are a few options, or there are few (not many) options? Regardless of whatever he says, there's tens of options
Can somebody please tell this thing to these irresponsible folks at Chelsea? They don't seem to mind spending despite empty stadiums do they?
I read it as a few options first time, but now I'm not so sure...What is he even saying? There are a few options, or there are few (not many) options? Regardless of whatever he says, there's tens of options
We already had money to spend though.Can somebody please tell this thing to these irresponsible folks at Chelsea? They don't seem to mind spending despite empty stadiums do they?
What is he even saying? There are a few options, or there are few (not many) options? Regardless of whatever he says, there's tens of options
I read it as a few options first time, but now I'm not so sure...
Lucky you, we also have some spare money as you can guess, but we our leeches of owners have other priorities.We already had money to spend though.
The big difference with the absolute parasites who are owning our club.Because they’re owned by a Russian Olicharch who wants to see his club on top again.
City offer 89m € + 5m € in add ons for Gimenez.
Chiesa is one of the best young Italians, there has never been a negotiation with Fiorentina for him, that is how things still stand today.
This is slowly devolving into a "he-said-she-said" situation.
This is slowly devolving into a "he-said-she-said" situation.
The guy's only 23. I think that's a bargain, considering what we forked out for Maguire.
Thought the same about him from that EL semi final and been seeing a few posts similar. Not sure what's the play here , are we trying to provide competition to Brandon Williams ? If he can't replace/cover for Shaw any better than Williams , then even at 30m, thats a lot of money for an average signing unless there is raw potential .They play in completely different positions and have different footballing attributes. Theres a reason why he's only £30m and its because theres absolutely nobody else in for him. Decent but not amazing going forward and he's bang average defensively.
The way Ole speaks about wanting to buy players who want to play for United completely rules out this guy. I doubt the money is the issue because it's not a lot of money. It's the fact that this kid wants to use United as a stepping stone with release clauses and all that. When we buy a player investing millions, he becomes our asset on the balance sheet.We must control the rights and benefits arising from that asset. Just get Telles and move on from this guy.He wants to be at Madrid even though they don't want him. Lets not fund their transfer business. I criticize Woodward alot but of late he has woken up to people taking advantage of United.The guy's only 23. I think that's a bargain, considering what we forked out for Maguire.