Time for the dominoes to topple.
Re: Guendouzi
Wait, only 16 million pounds for him?
Why aren't we all over this?!
He's miles better then VDB and just what we need, an energetic young defensive midfielder.
What, his personality isn't the best?
Exactly. Makes absolute no sense. Just guessing like the rest of the British media do when it comes to us.Grealish plays on the opposite side of the pitch to Sancho?
Time for the dominoes to topple.
A pittance in today's world for a player of this quality. The way he plays, he'd fit in any top team, injury or not.It might be the wages, who knows...
Ciro Immobile renews his contract with Lazio until 2025.
They're probably expecting him to continue to deliver like Fabio Quagliarella did.Big contract for a 30 year old. Guess he is class for them though.
For instance, I doubt we'd have bought Thiago Silva as a stopgap if we knew he was available. I think multiple top PL teams would be interested. City are still after another CB, think we (Chelsea) would be interested.
Who knows, maybe he isn't "available" per se but if someone came in with £80m they'd sell and that's what you guys are planning to do.
He’s perfect as a free signing. Would give us 2 years imo and is a quality finisher.Would love to see him at Utd on either a one year or two year deal
Can't imagine that if Upamecano was indeed available for the right price this window several other big clubs wouldn't be in for him.
Someone asked Man. City correspondent Sam Lee about Houssem Aouar. This is what he had to say:
Yeah, pretty much what I said really.RB wanted to extend because he would have been left with 1 year.
"
Leipzig conceded in June that they may have to sanction a sale, as they could not afford to let a prized asset run down the final 12 months of his contract.
Sporting director Oliver Mintzlaff told Bild: "'Upa' is an extremely important player for us and one of the most sought-after talents in Europe.
"And we can assure that we have a clear understanding with him and his agent he won't leave us on a free. We can't afford that as a club."
Chelsea are being asked for the the exact same initial fee that Dortmund want for Sancho (80 mil euro). I just think the subsequent installments are a bit less and Leverkusen are not in the CL. Overall, not an entirely different situation. It's just that Chelsea are paying and we are not.
Totally agree. They don't really play the same position, anyway.Because Villa aren't going to demand an insane fee for Grealish aren't they? They're going to want upwards of £80m i bet, which in that case, we may as well just pay the extra bit that Dortmund want for Sancho. The media are useless nowadays!
Wish we'd just cough up the cash for Sancho. He's twice the footballer Grealish will ever be.
It's a bit strange that a club that has financial difficulties is going for 120m or nothing. You'd think that 80-90 up front, with the rest in installments would be helpful if they indeed are poor.All the reports were that Dortmund wants the entire 120m upfront (due to their current dodgy financial situation) whereas we wanted to pay in instalments.
People saying they want 120 up front are just spreading a baseless myth. We'll probably still get this over the line.It's a bit strange that a club that has financial difficulties is going for 120m or nothing. You'd think that 80-90 up front, with the rest in installments would be helpful if they indeed are poor.
Big contract for a 30 year old. Guess he is class for them though.
People saying they want 120 up front are just spreading a baseless myth. We'll probably still get this over the line.
All the reports were that Dortmund wants the entire 120m upfront (due to their current dodgy financial situation) whereas we wanted to pay in instalments.
The other problem is whether Dortmund's agents send that info out on time and not delay things any further.Yeah still convinced they would accept £85-£90m up front with another instalment of between £18-23m next year, however it really comes down to whether or not Utd are willing to meet that
Luke Edwards of Telegraph is now consistent with Mark Ogden, stating are considering an approach - mindful that if we wait for the new release clause there will be too much competition.
Because the release clause for this summer was €60 million. Next summer is ~€45 million. Perhaps we feel we can split the difference?Why on earth didn't we make a move while this summer's release clause was still in effect?
We've missed our chance for this summer.
That's why I don't think the links to Upamecano are legitimate. We've tracked him for a few years, but I don't think we'll make a move for him this summer.Why on earth didn't we make a move while this summer's release clause was still in effect?
We've missed our chance for this summer.
Because the release clause for this summer was €60 million. Next summer is ~€45 million. Perhaps we feel we can split the difference?
Because the release clause for this summer was €60 million. Next summer is ~€45 million. Perhaps we feel we can split the difference?
That's why I don't think the links to Upamecano are legitimate. We've tracked him for a few years, but I don't think we'll make a move for him this summer.
If it’s a brief, none of the big lot (Stone, Peach, Ducker, Hirst) have got it which would be a bit strange. More likely some agent talk that the club haven’t bothered to deny yet imo.Sorry, but this has "Woodward briefing" written all over it. Reminds me of the "United Bid 90m for Varane" days.
The cash component is a point for discussion, but giving them Axel as part of the deal is perfectly acceptable.The only way a deal for Upamecano happens is if we are willing to let them have Axel in addition to more than his 2021 release clause.
Refresh the page or click on the tweet. You should be able to see it now.