dev1l
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 9,598
Problem with Silvestre was that his legs were faster than.his brain.I didn’t hate Silvestre, but we can do better I think
Problem with Silvestre was that his legs were faster than.his brain.I didn’t hate Silvestre, but we can do better I think
Woodward likes to place a bid a week or two after a release clause expires. It's a genius tactic and is why he earns the big money.We have every right to go for the same players and target players with release clauses. We never do though.
Those lustrous locks will be grey within a month.He will prove to be a great united manager. Just the kind of manager United needs.
He'll be bald....againThose lustrous locks will be grey within a month.
Huh, here's something new: Felipe Anderson might leave West Ham with both Lazio and Arsenal targeting him.
I didn’t hate Silvestre, but we can do better I think
Me neither. He had a decent season in 2003 alongside Rio and always made for a solid if cautious Left back.
Maybe that's his plan all along, get rid of the deadwood by infiltrating another club, clearing the slate for his arrival. Visionary.If that's what he wants then he should stay in Inter Milan buying all our deadwood players.
We had one moody cnut. Don't need anotherHe will prove to be a great united manager. Just the kind of manager United needs.
Yeah we will continue with the mediocrity.We had one moody cnut. Don't need another
With him, yes.Yeah we will continue with the mediocrity.
How much Chelsea paid for him again? Reminder Milan paid Chelsea 5m euro for the previous loan.So about £35m for Bakayoko. Brilliant. That's about 90% of the initial fee we paid for him.
How much Chelsea paid for him again? Reminder Milan paid Chelsea 5m euro for the previous loan.
According to Transfermarkt, it's 40 million Euros. However, I also found a Telegraph article that made the transfer fee to be 40 million Pounds. Make of that what you will.How much Chelsea paid for him again? Reminder Milan paid Chelsea 5m euro for the previous loan.
How much Chelsea paid for him again? Reminder Milan paid Chelsea 5m euro for the previous loan.
It was £40m. He's a decent player and I hope he goes on to do well for himself in Italy, but he was a terrible buy for us. I'm glad we're recouping most of it back.
Interestingly, the one consistent message from Dortmund has been that Sancho will stick around for at least one more season. I think they want more suitors to come in for him to make this a bidding war.
Posturing IMO. They don't need to sell this year, but they're not likely to earn enough as a club next year without selling him, to turn a profit.It's beginning to sound like this isn't happening. Or that BVB genuinely have no financial need to sell this year.
I guess even SAF came out with similar before he sanctioned selling Ronaldo to Madrid.Posturing IMO. They don't need to sell this year, but I they're not likely to earn enough as a club next year without selling him to turn a profit.
I doubt that Dortmund would give up their strong position. The ball's been in our court for a while. It's up to the club to submit another offer if they haven't already or for Dortmund's agents to stop screwing around.It's beginning to sound like this isn't happening. Or that BVB genuinely have no financial need to sell this year.
Yeah and it's not like that was at a point we posted a loss and also in COVID world where our revenues have dropped. Think they'll need to sell and Sanchos their best hope of income that will sort them out. Maybe they'll sell others, but I'm not sure.I guess even SAF came out with similar before he sanctioned selling Ronaldo to Madrid.
I genuinely dont think we have the cashflow this year. If we dont, BVB will also know this by now. Which would mean there is an impasse and can only proceed if BVB blink before end of window.I doubt that Dortmund would give up their strong position. The ball's been in our court for a while. It's up to the club to submit another offer if they haven't already or for Dortmund's agents to stop screwing around.
It's not a done deal yet as Milan could still pull out of this agreement next year.
With his current contract runs out in 2022 so he'd have only 1 year's left when his loan finishes next year.
I've not seen him play I admit but I looked at his stats and he doesn't appear any good at the price rumoured.
Is he any better than Bailly for example? I don't see the point in signing him from all the stuff I've read.
Nice one cheers
- Gabriel is left-footed. United won't have a left-footed CB after Rojo leaves. Gabriel would be our #5 and Maguire the #4.
- Gabriel is not as rash as Bailly and gives fewer fouls away. So fewer free kicks to score against United with.
- Gabriel has no serious injury record unlike Bailly.
I misread it as obligation to buy. Chelsea have to insist on that, in my opinion. An option to buy makes no sense as he'd be worth half of that if Milan pass on the option.
Don’t want Conte in the future. His management style and tactics don’t suit us in the slightest.
Your'e mad. He's toxic, worse than Mourinho. Don't want him anywhere near our club.Would take him anyday.
I agree. He's a quality manager but like Mourinho would be a poor fit for us and not the direction we should be headed in.Don’t want Conte in the future. His management style and tactics don’t suit us in the slightest.
Because our world class negotiators go in there with a "we can sign players other clubs can only dream of" attitude, so the selling club goes "oh yeah? You think so?".
He’s a United fan, like his father according to interview in norwegian supporter club website/fanzine. (Paywall, text in norwegian).Nothing good has ever come of Liverpool supporting Norwegians playing for United!