Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter KM
- Start date
- Status
He's a decent passer with a wicked left footed shot at times who will win the ball back more than an AM like Eriksen. He's more of an all rounder, neat play and some nice passes but will also put his foot in a bit.
Last edited:
We need something solid to put on our right wing instead of Young.
I'd describe him more as a dribbler but yeah he can do those things too. Just think that he sometimes holds on the ball a bit too much. Reminds me a bit of Isco. Great at beating his man in midfield though.
ASA getting 6 awards at the Outstanding Shotcrete Concrete Awards
What does GCCA have to do? Absolute jokeThis
ASA getting 6 awards at the Outstanding Shotcrete Concrete Awards
they need to change from their ready made solutions and mix it up a bit!All these random players we are linked with, we will never sign them. Our club name is just put there to generate more reads and clicks. It's really despicable and i'll never believe it. Not that i want those players here though. I believe Ole has a list of his own players for Ed to buy and the club will stick by that
Sports Witness with their big muppet juice straw in our nest again.
Guess we don't want Skriniar as we've already got a CB done and dusted.
Nathan Collins
What good will it do to announce it like this? Yea to appease the fans after an awful season but his price will shoot up an extra 100mil after this.
Maybe they've already agreed a deal and are waiting until after the Europa League final to announce it.
fecks me off the way they go about their transfers. No respect.
I highly doubt it. Chelsea aren't exactly itching to sell. They can't find a replacement seeing as how they're banned from the market pending ongoing arbitration.
BBC saying Spurs bid £53m for Lo Celso, although Betis want more
Mourinho was absolutely right, Pogba does seem like a bargain only 3 years later.
thanks for the info
Would be surprised if someone offered them more than that. He is really good, but the amount they want is a bit ridiculous.
How are a club like Real Betis in a position to hold out for that kind of money? Surely not like.
No it won’t. As fans we make out transfer dealings to be far more dramatic and movie like than they most likely are. Smokescreens, acting like you have alternatives to a player, not talking about your budget because clubs will try to fleece you more, it’s all nonsense.
Football is a very small pool, and the best players in the world an even smaller pool. Big transfers take months to go through properly. They don’t happen in one day. Chelsea will be well aware of Madrid’s interest from quite a while now, and in all likelihood have probably been negotiating with them for some time now. This interview isn’t going to make Roman suddenly “Hang on! These guys really want Hazard! Add another hundred million to his price!”
Release clause of 88 mil but spurs offer 53. Surely It has to be a lot closer than 53 mil.
Surely It has to be a lot closer than 53 mil.Release clause of 88 mil but spurs offer 53.
Since when does release clause = market value?
Never said It did.
They have a release clause for a reason and why would they accept around 50 mil?
I don't think that's what he means
Because that's a lot of money for a club like Betis?
Everyone in Spain has release clauses, doesn't mean they won't sell for less. Release clauses get triggered quite rarely.
They should accept a low ball offer for a player they for some reason value rather highly because its a lot of money for them?
Where did you study business?
Yes I know. I was saying it should be closer not the same as release clause.
They really shouldn't sell for that price. Lo Celso isn't just one of their best players. He's their best player. Statistically, the second most creative player in the league behind Messi in terms of overall play.
They can hold out because they know someone will eventually pay. Nevertheless that article is fecking shite.
Why would Spurs bid 53mil with their first attempt, it doesn't make sense.
£53m is not a "low ball" offer. A release clause figure is not a valuation.
If the report is accurate - a big IF of course - then that would be a club-record bid from Spurs, which I wouldn't see us increasing. But if R. Betis think they can get more from another club that the player is willing to go, then good luck to them.
More tweets less discussion please you cnuts
I know that but they seem to value him, if they didnt his release clause wouldn't be as high unless you're telling me every player in spain has a release clause close to 100 mil.
I think its low ball considering he is their best player/his high clause and spurs not increasing their offer shouldn't mean they should be stupid enough to sell him.
You can see all the tweets in one place through the transfer tweets link at the top of the page.
Only when people post tweets on here. Stop discussing with me! Tweets!!
Luke Shaw?
Not as rounded as a concrete block.
AVB at Marseille
- Status