Devil81
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 6,919
Well be about £3m a year but wouldnt the club have to pay part of his contract if they are selling him anyway, we always seem to be doing it with our players like Blind recently from what I read. If he sits on the bench for three years he will probably struggle to get any kind of decent contract afterwards anyway so in the long run could be worse off staying.
Also lets not forget he has probably doubled or trebled his wage signing for them in the first place so not like going back to the old wage is bread and water again.
I am probably being naive of course, I agree with you and greed is a bad thing. If I was a top footballer though I would want to be playing regularly at the highest level I could, especially at the age he is at not warming a bench for 20% of my career for big money. Lets face it, his career started quite late as he didnt ever break through with us....sayign that it has peaked already hasnt it, will never have another year like his Lecister one if he played ever week for another 100 years
Yes, we all live in the world of our dreams and fantasies but the reality is these lads are living the dream. They've made it as pro footballers and they are now looking at the benefits of playing at the top level, the main benefit is complete financial stability for the rest of their living days if they get the right contracts. Drinkwater is a half decent player who hit the jackpot winning the league with Leicester, he will never ever top that moment and the fact he's got himself such a decent move and contract is amazing really.
To walk away from a contract so financially rich for a lesser contract would actually be lunacy, regardless of how much you love the game, your family and your lifestyle should always take first priority.