Zoo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 30,294
Then that is probably the guy we should go for instead of Sandro.
Juventus sure are spending loads this transfer window. Where are they getting all the sudden influx of cash from?
So the Alex Sandro deal is probably done and we're just waiting for Juventus to get a replacement?
Juventus sure are spending loads this transfer window. Where are they getting all the sudden influx of cash from?
A lot of the money they have paid out for players is in instalments I think, presumably they have suitors for several players as well and know they will have money coming back in. I would expect Higuain and Rugani to get them the Ronaldo fee back alone, Sturaro might be on the way out as well.
They won't be in a bad position in terms of net spend after that. Might make a Sandro sale less likely as they probably don't really need to sell him.
My thoughts as well... whether Jose agrees is more important though.Why didn't we just get Telles ourselves?
Or PSG are.So the Alex Sandro deal is probably done and we're just waiting for Juventus to get a replacement?
Why didn't we just get Telles ourselves?
This Lukaku RW idea might be the worst idea ever posted on this forum.
Because we are signing Sandro? HopefullyWhy didn't we just get Telles ourselves?
Sandro iss 27 and Telles is 25, with Sandro being better and more proven. Also Porto want the 40m clause for telles and juve want around 50-55m for sandro, cheaper but not by much. I'll take Sandro he is a beast!Yeah I don't get it either. He will probably be cheaper, is younger and seems similar enough in terms of play style
"A bid of more than £60m from Spurs would make things interesting, although Telegraph Sport understands the United hierarchy are not ready to give up on Martial and want to give him another season under Mourinho to see whether he can reignite his career."
Just stick a £120m price tag to that fecker Levy!
I'm pretty sure we can strike a deal with Juve by offering 50+10 in add ons.Sandro iss 27 and Telles is 25, with Sandro being better and more proven. Also Porto want the 40m clause for telles and juve want around 50-55m for sandro, cheaper but not by much. I'll take Sandro he is a beast!
I can guarantee if Martial was a Spurs player and it was the other way round, he'd be tied to a contract until 2025 with no release clause and no chance of escape.
Yeah, feck him. No way we sell to him/ Spurs considering the contempt with which they treat us. Either abroad or nowhere.
So the Alex Sandro deal is probably done and we're just waiting for Juventus to get a replacement?
So the Alex Sandro deal is probably done and we're just waiting for Juventus to get a replacement?
This is what I think too - probably why the deal wasn't done sooner. I don't think Juve wanted to sell without having someone else lined up.
That is some serious bs. You're comparing individuals or the teams they've played for? Willian's best season came for Chelsea last year with 6 goals and 7 assists. Do you want other members of that squad who've also picked up league titles? Cahill maybe? "His achievements" don't compare to someone like Romagnoli or Gimenez.
The man you imply as having no "achievements" similiarly has
1 x DFB Pokal
1 x La Liga
1 x Copa Del Rey
1 x FIFA World Cup
I suppose comparing team trophies makes adequate comparison of ability to you?
Look at both of their seasons individually.
3 seasons ago:
At Rennes, Ousmane Dembele had 12 goals and 5 assists, making 4.1 dribbles per game, having 2 shots and making 1.7 key passes per game with a whoscored rating of 7.55
At Chelsea, (looking better in a horrible team)
Willian's had 5 goals and 6 assists, making 2.4 dribbles per game, having 2.3 shots and 1.7 key passes with a whoscored rating of 7.20
That's comparing a player in his prime at 27 to a kid just turned 18. But okay, someone will argue Dembele played in a "farmers league" surely he wouldn't compare to the great Willian if he moved up to a better league.
2 seasons ago: (at Borussia Dortmund)
Dembele had 6 goals and 12 assists having 1.7 shots pg, completing 2 key passes per game and 3.3 dribbles per game. Whoscored rating of 7.44
Willian meanwhile failing to cement his place under a new coach after his " heroics" in Chelsea's dark and disastrous season in the new title winning team succeeded in starting only 15 games.
In the roughly 1600 minutes he did play under Conte's league winning team, he had 8 goals and 1 assist in 34 league appearances. Who scored rating of 6.89.
Last season:
Dembele suffered a bad injury and was out for most of the season but the little while he did return at the end of the season for he made 12 starts and played 931 minutes scoring 3 and assisting 6, whoscored rating of 7.15.
Willian having another great season while the rest of team suffered, had 6 goals and 7 assists in almost 1900 minutes. With a whoscored rating of 7.01
Who would you take based on current ability? 30 year old Willian or 21 year old Dembele? Or does Willian's time at Shaktar 7 frigging years ago give him the edge over Dembele?
Great post, couldn't agree more...That is some serious bs. You're comparing individuals or the teams they've played for? Willian's best season came for Chelsea last year with 6 goals and 7 assists. Do you want other members of that squad who've also picked up league titles? Cahill maybe? "His achievements" don't compare to someone like Romagnoli or Gimenez.
The man you imply as having no "achievements" similiarly has
1 x DFB Pokal
1 x La Liga
1 x Copa Del Rey
1 x FIFA World Cup
I suppose comparing team trophies makes adequate comparison of ability to you?
Look at both of their seasons individually.
3 seasons ago:
At Rennes, Ousmane Dembele had 12 goals and 5 assists, making 4.1 dribbles per game, having 2 shots and making 1.7 key passes per game with a whoscored rating of 7.55
At Chelsea, (looking better in a horrible team)
Willian's had 5 goals and 6 assists, making 2.4 dribbles per game, having 2.3 shots and 1.7 key passes with a whoscored rating of 7.20
That's comparing a player in his prime at 27 to a kid just turned 18. But okay, someone will argue Dembele played in a "farmers league" surely he wouldn't compare to the great Willian if he moved up to a better league.
2 seasons ago: (at Borussia Dortmund)
Dembele had 6 goals and 12 assists having 1.7 shots pg, completing 2 key passes per game and 3.3 dribbles per game. Whoscored rating of 7.44
Willian meanwhile failing to cement his place under a new coach after his " heroics" in Chelsea's dark and disastrous season in the new title winning team succeeded in starting only 15 games.
In the roughly 1600 minutes he did play under Conte's league winning team, he had 8 goals and 1 assist in 34 league appearances. Who scored rating of 6.89.
Last season:
Dembele suffered a bad injury and was out for most of the season but the little while he did return at the end of the season for he made 12 starts and played 931 minutes scoring 3 and assisting 6, whoscored rating of 7.15.
Willian having another great season while the rest of team suffered, had 6 goals and 7 assists in almost 1900 minutes. With a whoscored rating of 7.01
Who would you take based on current ability? 30 year old Willian or 21 year old Dembele? Or does Willian's time at Shaktar 7 frigging years ago give him the edge over Dembele?
Great post, couldn't agree more...
The initial poster got it right by pointing out 'team achievements' in his attempt at making a case for Willian. It does count a lot in football when assessing individual quality. More importantly, Willian played key roles in his teams in almost every title winning achievement. The same cannot be said about Dembele's role in at least three of those four titles you listed for him.
Also, we need to put stats in perspective. One can go on and on listing players with unimpressive goal and assist stats yet were crucial to the overall performances of their teams and by every definition, highly qualitative as players. Players like Xavi, Iniesta, Makalele, Kanu, Paulo Di Canio and even Bergkamp (for Arsenal) didn't score much but were incredible considering their overall contributions.
I think the thing about Willian is that he is a superb team player who works extremely hard for the team and provides balance. He links up brilliantly between attack and defence. For a manager like Jose Mourinho, that's a special player to have.
You are right about Dembele's talent and pptential. I have no doubts that he can be a better footballer considering his incredible technical abilities. But if the debate is about right now, Willian is a much more experienced and accomplished footballer. I am willing to bet that if Barcelona does buy him, he will be a starter in most games. If Dembele had met their expectations by now, Barca wouldn't be looking at signing Willian at such an expensive fee as is being rumoured.
The initial poster got it right by pointing out 'team achievements' in his attempt at making a case for Willian. It does count a lot in football when assessing individual quality. More importantly, Willian played key roles in his teams in almost every title winning achievement. The same cannot be said about Dembele's role in at least three of those four titles you listed for him.
Also, we need to put stats in perspective. One can go on and on listing players with unimpressive goal and assist stats yet were crucial to the overall performances of their teams and by every definition, highly qualitative as players. Players like Xavi, Iniesta, Makalele, Kanu, Paulo Di Canio and even Bergkamp (for Arsenal) didn't score much but were incredible considering their overall contributions.
I think the thing about Willian is that he is a superb team player who works extremely hard for the team and provides balance. He links up brilliantly between attack and defence. For a manager like Jose Mourinho, that's a special player to have.
You are right about Dembele's talent and pptential. I have no doubts that he can be a better footballer considering his incredible technical abilities. But if the debate is about right now, Willian is a much more experienced and accomplished footballer. I am willing to bet that if Barcelona does buy him, he will be a starter in most games. If Dembele had met their expectations by now, Barca wouldn't be looking at signing Willian at such an expensive fee as is being rumoured.
Look at the right now then. For every year that Dembele has been involved in football he's been better than Willian.
Willian, who is a winger. Not Iniesta, not Xavi, not Makelele. If you won't judge a winger based on his key passes (crossing ability), dribbles completed (sheer dribbling and speed) and basic chances created and goals scored what will you judge him on? His work rate? Tackles? Clearances? Are we looking for a wing back?
Being part of a winning squad has little to no say on your own ability. Like I said, would you take today, Cahill or Godin? Pedro or Griezmann? Willian has been a peripheral figure in every winning season, and when he has shone it's been through a squad that's been utter shit and murky. Case in point the post Mourinho season and the 2nd Conte season.
Willian managed to get 15 starts in the season before last.
In the 2014/15 title winning season, Willian had 2 goals and 3 assists (a forward, I remind you)
Dembele managed to get 12 in Barcas La Liga winning season even after missing most of the season on injury. Dembele was also absolutely central to that Dortmund team that won the Cup and got the highest points tally to finish 2nd in the Bundesliga.
I perfectly understood the op when they said Willian had one XYZ things. The fact is it's meaningless when you compare players to determine who is better today. You must compare players based on their individual achievements and performances. Especially when one of the two is a 21 year old who's just one week ago completed his third year of first team football and the other is a 30 year old winger who's importance has gone from squad player to our only alive and willing player and back again seemingly every 3 games over the last 4 years.
If you want to judge Dembele based on his team achievements he has at least the same achievements in a very short period. He has the stats to boot that he's performed at a better standard too.
Thing is our team is missing goals/assists not another work horse. Where do you think all our goals will come from then? Lukaku alone?So you are saying that being a key contributor to winning a lot of silverware says little about a player's quality as an individual? That's a bit odd because being a constant winner over many years must surely say something about a player's individual quality.
But let's set that aside for a while. The great Kanu played 12 seasons for Arsenal as a forward and scored only 54 goals. Most people will agree that he is one of the premier leagues legendary forwards. Bergkamp played 315 games for the same club and scored just 87 goals. The point is that you can be a great forward and yet your goals/assist stats may not reflect it especially if you are the kind of forward Willian is. The 'Willian brand' does not sell on the basis of goals and assist stats. It sells on the basis of team balance. You buy a Willian for his pace, drive, hardwork, creativity and the often rare ability to find the right balance between attack and defence. These are things Willian does well while providing attacking threats and creating chances. Douglas Costa has better goals/assists (slightly better, i should point out) stats than Willian but there is a reason why Willian is Brazil's first choice. And there is a reason, Barcelona might be paying a lot of money to buy the 29 year old when they already have Dembele.
Like I said, I take nothing away from the kid. He has a splendid future ahead of him but he needs some time to grow fully into his incredible potential.
Thing is our team is missing goals/assists not another work horse. Where do you think all our goals will come from then? Lukaku alone?