RedFish
Full Member
Would love to see Geraint Thomas lead the tour team for Sky one day. Dan Martin is another rider I got a lot of time for. Pure racer. Shame he's out after that collar bone fracture sustained in Giro.
What a rider! Really impressive. But can he climb with the best? Maybe Van Garderen, this year, can do something too? Can't wait to see the battle of the super-domestiques. Can Rodgers do what Porte does for Froome? Can Thomas and Kiriyenka relentlessly drive the Sky train to pummel Saxo-Tinkoff, Movistar and BMC into submission?
Froome abandoned
Just saw that, not sure if it's correct or not, didn't he fall off earlier on too?
15:43Chris Froome quits
Chris Froome is injured. He calls it a quit.
15:42Froome crashes again!
Chris Froome has crashed again. He looks like giving up at km 85.
I imagine Wiggins with a smile on his face after seeing this.
Its a pity for the tour that he is out.
This disaster is Brailsford's making. Never liked the guy for shooting his mouth off about Lance and getting a lot of spotlight purely for commanding some extremely talented personnel both on the track and now on the road. You pick your best riders for the tour because you need every advantage you can get. Wiggins' technical ability on the bike and experience would've been a huge asset, especially in a tour with cobblestone sections. Froome wouldn't have crashed 3 times behind a rider like Wiggins. No justification for not taking Wiggins. It was purely a personal decision and was the coward's way out of the potential problem of both Wiggins and Froome being in contention for the yellow jersey.
This disaster is Brailsford's making. Never liked the guy for shooting his mouth off about Lance and getting a lot of spotlight purely for commanding some extremely talented personnel both on the track and now on the road. You pick your best riders for the tour because you need every advantage you can get. Wiggins' technical ability on the bike and experience would've been a huge asset, especially in a tour with cobblestone sections. Froome wouldn't have crashed 3 times behind a rider like Wiggins. No justification for not taking Wiggins. It was purely a personal decision and was the coward's way out of the potential problem of both Wiggins and Froome being in contention for the yellow jersey.
Be serious a second, you are belgium you have to know a little bit about cyclism, you know how it works, Wiggins isn't a team player and Froome is the strongest, the good choice was to let Wiggins out because of his mentality, he wants to be the big fish in the pond and it was impossible with Froome.
The fact that Froome abandoned doesn't change anything in cyclism there is only one leader not 2, not 1.5, only 1.
Wiggins had given assurances he would ride for Froome. Brailsford and Froome didn't trust him to completely sacrifice himself for Froome and so left him out. The thing is though, Froome would have been the official leader regardless of whether Wiggins rode or not and Wiggins getting the best out of himself would've 100% been to the protection of Froome as things like bike handling and positioning are just things you cannot buy in cycling. Wiggins has it, Froome doesn't. You can accept a rider like Wiggins holding the idea in his head that the opportunity to win the race might open up for him. It costs you nothing.
Would Wiggins ride himself into the ground for Froome in the mountains, no, but then the Schleck brothers didn't do that either, they just played cat and mouse with everybody else by launching attack after attack while the other brother would follow in the wheels of the chasers. Wiggins would still be more useful for Froome, keeping a bit in reserve for himself, than any number of super domestiques. You have to understand bike racing to get it and as the director sportif, it's Brailsford's job to manage his options. Instead he decided to disarm himself of one of his strongest cards just to avoid a rift between Wiggins and Froome. To relate it to football, it was a Moyesesque decision.
I know cycling like you seems to do.
And you are right he could have been instrumental for the Sky, but honestly i don't trust him and i don't trust Froome either. I fear that the strengh of the team would have been divided to protect both.